US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 30.2.12
Establishing That a Person or Entity Qualifies to Receive
Payment on Basis of Reassignment - for Carrier Processed Claims
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
B3-3060.8
Any person or entity wishing to receive Part B payment as a reassignee of one or more
physicians (or other practitioner or supplier), or as the supplier of the services, must
furnish to the carrier sufficient information to establish clearly that it qualifies to receive
payment for those services. Where there is any doubt that the person or entity qualifies,
the carrier must obtain additional evidence.
In some cases, an entity may qualify to receive payment for the services of a physician on
the basis of one or more of the exceptions listed in §30.2. As soon as it is determined that
an organization can qualify on any basis, no further development may be needed for that
physician or for other physicians having the same status. However, where some other
physicians have or appear to have different status, further development is required. In
some cases a determination is made that Part B payment can be made only to the
physician.
Subject to the provisions of §§30, a reassignee assumes liability for any overpayments
that it receives and should be so advised.
A. Payment to Special Accounts
Sometimes a major institution, such as a medical school or university, may want the
Medicare checks due it for physician services to go into particular specialty accounts (or
funds, or so-called group practices) which are subdivisions of the institution, and may ask
that these accounts be identified on their Medicare checks for internal accounting
purposes.
Ideally, to indicate the subordinate nature of the account in relation to the institution,
carriers list the name of the institution first on the check, followed by the name of the
appropriate account. However, identifying the payee in this manner may cause serious
claims processing difficulties, fostering confusion between various accounts of the same
institution. To avoid this problem, carriers may list the name of the account first,
followed by the name of the institution, e.g., Radiology Fund or General Medical Center,
if the institution submits a letter accepting responsibility for any claims submitted, and
payments made, under the special designations. The letter needs to describe the special
designations the institution wants on the checks for the various accounts and include a
statement to the following effect:
The (name of institution) accepts the same responsibility for the Medicare claims
and payments made under these special designations as it would have if the
payments were made by Medicare in the name of (name of institution) without
these special designations.
This statement is required in addition to the statement the institution submits to establish
its right to receive payment for the physicians’ services.
If the above procedure is used as a basis for Part B payments in the names of
departments, specialties, or similar subdivisions of a university or medical school or an
associated nonprofit foundation or teaching hospital, each subdivision may also execute,
or refrain from executing, a participation agreement for physician services in that
subdivision. This is an exception to the rule that a participation agreement may only be
executed by a person or legal entity. This exception applies only in the medical school or
university medical center context.
History
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
0dee17b1933ead480fc511453f51029d22cc8766461cb648176b7ec02d4e05e2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.