Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 20.2

Provider Change of Ownership (CHOW)

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Providers (as defined in 1861(u) of the Act, and institutional suppliers such as RHCs) that

undergo a change in their ownership structure are required to notify CMS concerning the

identity of the old and new owners. They are also required to inform CMS on how they

will organize the new entity and when the change will take place. A terminating cost

report will be required from the seller owner in all CHOWs for certification purposes.

There are five types of changes that can occur:

1. A CHOW in accordance with 42 CFR 489.18;

2. Changes in the ownership structure to an existing provider that do not constitute a

CHOW;

3. A new owner who purchases a participating provider but elects not to accept the

automatic assignment of the existing provider agreement, thus avoiding the old

owner’s Medicare liabilities;

4. An existing provider who acquires another existing provider (acquisition/merger);

and

5. Two or more existing providers who are totally reorganizing and becoming a new

provider (consolidation).

Providers that undergo a change of ownership will usually continue with the same FI that

served the previous owner. However, if the prospective owner does not wish to accept

the automatic assignment of the existing provider agreement, this means that the existing

provider agreement is terminated effective with the CHOW date. The regional office

must be notified in writing of the CHOW per instructions contained in section 3210.5 of

the State Operations Manual. The prospective owner provides a notice 45 -days in

advance of the CHOW to the CMS/RO to allow for the orderly transfer of any

beneficiaries that are patients of the provider. All reasonable steps must be taken to

ensure that beneficiaries under the care of the provider are aware of the prospective

termination of the agreement. There may be a period when the facility is not

participating and beneficiaries must have sufficient time and opportunity to make other

arrangement for care prior to the CHOW date.

After the CHOW has taken place, the RO acknowledges the refusal to accept assignment

in a letter to the new owner, with copies to the State Agency (SA) and the FI. The RO

completes a form CMS-2007 with the date the agreement is no longer in effect, noting

that the termination is due to the new owner’s refusal to accept assignment of the

provider agreement.

If the new owner refuses to accept assignment and also wishes to participate in the

Medicare program, the RO will first process the refusal as indicated above and then treat

the new owner as it would any new applicant to the program. The RO will obtain and

process the application documents, have the SA perform an initial survey and if all the

requirements for participation are met, assign an effective date of participation. The

earliest possible effective date for the applicant is the date that the RO determines that all

Federal requirements are met. Once this is completed, a new provider agreement with a

new provider number will be issued to the new owner. The provider will be assigned to

the local FI.

See chapter 10, of the Medicare Program Integrity Manual, for complete requirements for

completion of Form CMS-855 in change of ownership situations.

History

(Rev. 861, Issued: 02-17-06; Effective: 10-01-05; Implementation: 03-17-06)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
67945e035885c0e89c1513d11c0d7f2eb3473fd63e7a7a6881634164f6551a03
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.