US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 150.4
General Responsibilities of QIOs and A/B MACs (A) Related to
Expedited Determinations Based on Medicare Change of Status
Notifications (MCSNs)
(Rev. 13026, Issued: 12-27-24, Effective: 10-11-24 , Implementation: 02-15- 25)
This section provides claims processing instructions to implement an expedited hospital
status change appeals process required by final rule, CMS-4204-F.The resulting
regulations are located at 42 CFR Part 405.1210 through 405.1212.
Expedited hospital status change appeals are afforded to certain beneficiaries in Original
Medicare only who were initially admitted to a hospital as an inpatient by a physician but
whose status during their stay was changed to an outpatient receiving observation
services by the hospital’s utilization review committee (URC) (thereby effectively
denying Part A coverage for their hospital stay), and meet other conditions specified in
the court order. Regulations at 42 CFR 405.1210(b) require hospitals to notify
beneficiaries of their right to pursue an appeal regarding the decision to reclassify the
beneficiary from an inpatient to an outpatient receiving observation services. The
Medicare Change of Status Notice (CMS-10868) is the standardized notice to satisfy the
notification requirement.
After receipt of the MCSN, eligible beneficiaries are given the opportunity to appeal, and
may argue that their inpatient admission satisfied the relevant criteria for Part A coverage
and that the hospital URC’s determination to reclassify the beneficiary as an outpatient
receiving observation services was therefore erroneous. The change in status from
inpatient to outpatient may also affect coverage of the beneficiary’s post-hospital
extended care services furnished in a skilled nursing facility (SNF).
A. QIO Role
Once an eligible beneficiary has requested an appeal, the QIO reviews the records from
the hospital relative to the change in status, and verifies that the provider has given valid
notice. The QIO is responsible for establishing contact with the provider, so that the
beneficiary’s medical records can used in making a determination, although QIOs can
still make such decisions even if records are not provided. The QIO makes a decision on
coverage in answer to the beneficiary’s request for review of their change in status,
relaying this decision back to the beneficiary or their representative, as well as the
hospital. If the beneficiary does not agree with the QIO determination, they may request
that the QIO conduct a reconsideration.
B. A/B MAC (A) Role
A/B MACs (A) support beneficiaries and providers through an awareness of the
expedited determination process and by performing routine duties potentially affected by
this process--liability notice oversight, claims processing and medical review.
A/B MAC (A) medical review should never repeat or contradict the results of QIO
review regarding the change of status of the hospital claim, since this would be
duplicative and QIO decisions are binding. But the scope of these QIO decisions is
limited to the change in status, and medical review examines a much broader range of
potential issues and periods of care. For example, a monthly SNF claim may follow a
change of status reviewed by a QIO, but it also contains other days of billing that are
subject to additional coverage criteria. Other issues not considered by the QIO may still
be subject to medical review.
History
(Rev. 13026, Issued: 12-27-24, Effective: 10-11-24 , Implementation: 02-15- 25)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
367c6f68df2d1fc029503012886e4d2bf1a22481cb3d4be37e26cb44e50f7429
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.