US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-04, ch. 1, § 130.1
General Rules for Submitting Adjustment Requests
Adjustment requests are the most common mechanism for changing a previously
accepted bill. They are required to reflect the results of QIO medical review. CMS may
also require adjustments if it discovers that bills have been accepted and posted in error to
a particular record. Adjustments that only recoup or cancel a prior payment are “credits”
and must match the original in the following fields:
• Intermediary control number (ICN/DCN);
• Surname;
• Medicare beneficiary identifier
When a definite match cannot be made on the three fields above, the provider’s MAC
will use the fields below as needed. Note that for older claims, ICN/DCN probably will
not match.
• Date of birth;
• Admission Date for inpatient, (Date of First Service for outpatient) unless
changed by this adjustment requests; and
• From/thru dates for inpatient, (Date of First Service/Date of Last Service for
Outpatient), unless changed by this adjustment request.
Cancel-only adjustment requests are not acceptable, except in cases of incorrect provider
identification numbers and incorrect Medicare beneficiary identifier. The provider must
submit a corrected replacement bill (bill type xx1) to its MAC after submitting the
cancel-only request for the incorrect bill.
The provider must submit all other adjustment requests as debits only. It shows the
ICN/DCN of the bill to be adjusted as described above, with the bill type shown as xx7.
It submits adjustment requests to its MAC either electronically or on hard copy.
Electronic submission is preferred. The ICN/DCN of an associated claim shall only be
reported on adjustments. The MAC shall return to the provider any original claim
reporting information in this field.
The MAC must enter the following bill types that relate to the entity generating the
adjustment request:
xx7 Provider (debit)
xx8 Provider (cancel)
xxF Beneficiary
xxG CWF
xxH CMS
xxI MAC
xxM MSP
xxP QIO
xxJ Other
xxK OIG/GAO
The provider submits all adjustment requests as bill type xx7 or xx8. Since several
different sources can initiate an MSP adjustment (e.g., the provider, CWF, or the MAC),
the MSP designation, xxM, takes priority over any other source of an adjustment except
OIG/GAO. When the provider submits an MSP adjustment request, the MAC will
change the bill type to xxM. These priorities refer only to the designation of the source
of the adjustment. The difference between CWF generating the adjustment request and
CMS generating the adjustment request is: An adjustment request is CWF-generated if
the MAC receives a CWF unsolicited response, alert or a CMS-L1002.
The MAC prepares an adjustment if instructed by CMS CO or CMS RO to make a
change. Typically, such direction from CMS is to retroactively change payment for a
class or other group of bills. Occasionally, CMS will discover an error in the processing
of a single bill and direct the MAC to correct it.
If adjustments are rejected by CWF for additional corrections, they must be corrected and
resubmitted. Even if a letter from CMS requests the adjustment action, the MAC must
submit the adjustment request in its CWF record. If a rejected adjustment request is
determined to be unnecessary, the MAC stops the adjustment action upon receipt of
correction.
Where an adjustment request changes subsequent utilization, the MAC notes this and
processes adjustments to subsequent bills if it services the provider.
History
(Rev.11794, Issued:01-19-23, Effective: 04-01-23, Implementation:04-03-23)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
7f957c88939e008eb528eb2846f876387f61bcbc80192beba833fcc742e8e07c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.