US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-03, ch. 1, § 260.10
Heartsbreath Test for Heart Transplant Rejection (Effective
December 8, 2008)
(Rev.99, Issued: 02-13-09, Effective: 12-08-08, Implementation: 04-06-09)
A. General
The Heartsbreath test is a Food and Drug Administration-approved Humanitarian Use Device for
use only as an adjunct to the endomyocardial biopsy to detect grade 3 heart transplant rejection
in patients who have had a heart transplant within the last year and an endomyocardial biopsy
within the prior month. The test involves collecting breath samples from the patient and analysis
of the samples performed in a laboratory. These test results are then compared to
endomyocardial biopsy findings and the results are provided to the clinician shortly thereafter.
B. Nationally Covered Indications
N/A
C. Nationally Non-Covered Indications
Effective for services performed on or after December 8, 2008, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services has determined that the evidence does not adequately define the technical
characteristics of the test nor demonstrate that Heartsbreath testing to predict heart transplant
rejection improves health outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries. Thus, we conclude that the
Heartsbreath test is not reasonable and necessary under section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the Social
Security Act and is non-covered.
D. Other
N/A
(This NCD last reviewed December 2008.)
270 - Wound Treatment
(Rev 7, 03-19-04)
History
(Rev.99, Issued: 02-13-09, Effective: 12-08-08, Implementation: 04-06-09)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
8d4776eed7619e5ebd964e9f3e0da5435f9501b33e121839b899d1a969ab6bca
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.