US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-03, ch. 1, § 80.2.1
Ocular Photodynamic Therapy (OPT) - Effective April 3, 2013
A. General
Ocular Photodynamic Therapy (OPT) is used in the treatment of ophthalmologic
diseases; specifically, for age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a common eye
disease among the elderly. OPT involves the infusion of an intravenous photosensitizing
drug called verteporfin followed by exposure to a laser. OPT is only covered when used
in conjunction with verteporfin.
Effective July 1, 2001, OPT with verteporfin was approved for a diagnosis of neovascular
AMD with predominately classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesions
(where the area of classic CNV occupies ≥50% of the area of the entire lesion) at the
initial visit as determined by a fluorescein angiogram (FA).
On October 17, 2001, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced
its “intent to cover” OPT with verteporfin for AMD patients with occult and no classic
subfoveal CNV as determined by an FA. The October 17, 2001, decision was never
implemented.
On March 28, 2002, after thorough review and reconsideration of the October 17, 2001,
intent to cover policy, CMS determined that the current non-coverage policy for OPT for
verteporfin for AMD patients with occult and no classic subfoveal CNV as determined by
an FA should remain in effect.
Effective August 20, 2002, CMS issued a non-coverage instruction for OPT with
verteporfin for AMD patients with occult and no classic subfoveal CNV as determined by
an FA.
B. Nationally Covered Indications
Effective April 1, 2004, OPT with verteporfin continues to be approved for a diagnosis of
neovascular AMD with predominately classic subfoveal CNV lesions (where the area of
classic CNV occupies ≥50% of the area of the entire lesion) at the initial visit as
determined by an FA. (CNV lesions are comprised of classic and/or occult components.)
Subsequent follow-up visits require either an optical coherence tomography (OCT)
(effective April 3. 2013) or an FA (effective April 1, 2004) to access treatment response.
There are no requirements regarding visual acuity, lesion size, and number of retreatments when treating predominantly classic lesions.
In addition, after thorough review and reconsideration of the August 20, 2002, non-coverage policy, CMS determines that the evidence is adequate to conclude that OPT
with verteporfin is reasonable and necessary for treating:
1. Subfoveal occult with no classic CNV associated with AMD; and,
2. Subfoveal minimally classic CNV (where the area of classic CNV occupies <50%
of the area of the entire lesion) associated with AMD.
The above 2 indications are considered reasonable and necessary only when:
1. The lesions are small (4 disk areas or less in size) at the time of initial treatment
or within the 3 months prior to initial treatment; and,
2. The lesions have shown evidence of progression within the 3 months prior to
initial treatment. Evidence of progression must be documented by deterioration of
visual acuity (at least 5 letters on a standard eye examination chart), lesion growth
(an increase in at least 1 disk area), or the appearance of blood associated with the
lesion.
C. Nationally Non-Covered Indications
Other uses of OPT with verteporfin to treat AMD not already addressed by CMS will
continue to be non-covered. These include, but are not limited to, the following AMD
indications:
• Juxtafoveal or extrafoveal CNV lesions (lesions outside the fovea),
• Inability to obtain a fluorescein angiogram,
• Atrophic or “dry” AMD.
D. Other
The OPT with verteporfin for other ocular indications, such as pathologic myopia or
presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, continue to be eligible for local coverage
determinations through individual A/B MAC discretion.
History
(Rev. 173, Issued: 09-04-14, Effective: Upon Implementation: of ICD-10, Implementation: Upon Implementation of ICD-10)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
660eb4aad8340d050491d291d6b0aa9bfe791cdc5d0a6d821402fda254aea03d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.