US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-03, ch. 1, § 20.8.4
Leadless Pacemakers
A. General
The leadless pacemaker eliminates the need for a device pocket and insertion of a pacing
lead which are integral elements of traditional pacing systems. The removal of these
elements eliminate an important source of complications associated with traditional
pacing systems while providing similar benefits. Leadless pacemakers are delivered via
catheter to the heart, and function similarly to other transvenous single-chamber
ventricular pacemakers.
B. Nationally Covered Indications
Effective January 18, 2017, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) covers
leadless pacemakers through Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). CMS covers
leadless pacemakers when procedures are performed in Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) approved studies. CMS also covers, in prospective longitudinal studies, leadless
pacemakers that are used in accordance with the FDA approved label for devices that
have either:
• an associated ongoing FDA approved post-approval study; or
• completed an FDA post-approval study.
Each study must be approved by CMS and as a fully-described, written part of its
protocol, must address the following research questions:
• What are the peri-procedural and post-procedural complications of leadless
pacemakers?
• What are the long term outcomes of leadless pacemakers?
• What are the effects of patient characteristics (age, gender, comorbidities) on the
use and health effects of leadless pacemakers?
CMS will review studies to determine if they meet the 13 criteria listed below. If CMS
determines that they meet these criteria, the study will be posted on CMS’ CED website
(https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/Coverage-with-Evidence-Development/index.html).
a. The principal purpose of the study is to test whether the item or service
meaningfully improves health outcomes of affected beneficiaries who are
represented by the enrolled subjects.
b. The rationale for the study is well supported by available scientific and medical
evidence.
c. The study results are not anticipated to unjustifiably duplicate existing
knowledge.
d. The study design is methodologically appropriate and the anticipated number of
enrolled subjects is sufficient to answer the research question(s) being asked in
the National Coverage Determination.
e. The study is sponsored by an organization or individual capable of completing it
successfully.
f. The research study is in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations
concerning the protection of human subjects found in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 45 CFR Part 46. If a study is regulated by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), it is also in compliance with 21 CFR Parts 50 and
56. In addition, to further enhance the protection of human subjects in studies
conducted under CED, the study must provide and obtain meaningful informed
consent from patients regarding the risks associated with the study items and/or
services, and the use and eventual disposition of the collected data.
g. All aspects of the study are conducted according to appropriate standards of
scientific integrity.
h. The study has a written protocol that clearly demonstrates adherence to the
standards listed here as Medicare requirements.
i. The study is not designed to exclusively test toxicity or disease pathophysiology
in healthy individuals. Such studies may meet this requirement only if the disease
or condition being studied is life threatening as defined in 21 CFR §312.81(a) and
the patient has no other viable treatment options.
j. The clinical research studies and registries are registered on the
www.ClinicalTrials.gov website by the principal sponsor/investigator prior to the
enrollment of the first study subject. Registries are also registered in the Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Registry of Patient Registries
(RoPR).
k. The research study protocol specifies the method and timing of public release of
all prespecified outcomes to be measured including release of outcomes if
outcomes are negative or study is terminated early. The results must be made
public within 12 months of the study’s primary completion date, which is the date
the final subject had final data collection for the primary endpoint, even if the trial
does not achieve its primary aim. The results must include number
started/completed, summary results for primary and secondary outcome measures,
statistical analyses, and adverse events. Final results must be reported in a
publicly accessibly manner; either in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (in print or
on-line), in an on-line publicly accessible registry dedicated to the dissemination
of clinical trial information such as ClinicalTrials.gov, or in journals willing to
publish in abbreviated format (e.g., for studies with negative or incomplete
results).
l. The study protocol must explicitly discuss beneficiary subpopulations affected by
the item or service under investigation, particularly traditionally underrepresented
groups in clinical studies, how the inclusion and exclusion criteria effect
enrollment of these populations, and a plan for the retention and reporting of said
populations in the trial. If the inclusion and exclusion criteria are expected to
have a negative effect on the recruitment or retention of underrepresented
populations, the protocol must discuss why these criteria are necessary.
m. The study protocol explicitly discusses how the results are or are not expected to
be generalizable to affected beneficiary subpopulations. Separate discussions in
the protocol may be necessary for populations eligible for Medicare due to age,
disability or Medicaid eligibility.
Consistent with section 1142 of the Act, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ) supports clinical research studies that CMS determines meet the above-listed
standards and address the above-listed research questions.
All clinical research study protocols must be reviewed and approved by CMS. The
principal investigator must submit the complete study protocol, identify the relevant CMS
research question(s) that will be addressed and cite the location of the detailed analysis
plan for those questions in the protocol, plus provide a statement addressing how the
study satisfies each of the standards of scientific integrity (a. through m. listed above), as
well as the investigator’s contact information, to the address below. The information will
be reviewed, and approved studies will be identified on the CMS website.
Director, Coverage and Analysis Group
Re: Leadless Pacemakers CED
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
7500 Security Blvd., Mail Stop S3-02-01
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850
Email address for protocol submissions: clinicalstudynotification@cms.hhs.gov
Email subject line: “CED [NCD topic (i.e. Leadless Pacemakers)] [name of
sponsor/primary investigator]”
C. Nationally Non-Covered Indications
Leadless pacemakers are non-covered when furnished outside of a CMS approved CED
study.
D. Other
NA
(This NCD last reviewed January 2017.)
History
(Rev. 201, Issued: 07-28-17, Effective: 01-18-18, Implementation: 08-29-17- for MAC local edits; January 2, 2018 - for MCS shared edits)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
7ffb7605efa4e32089326c79a5638270bae2678a3d3746414cfafb210e6b9ae8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.