US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-03, ch. 1, § 20.7
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) (Various Effective
Dates Below)
(Rev. 12571; Issued: 04-11-24; Effective: 10-11-23; Implementation: 05-13-24)
A. General
This procedure involves inserting a balloon catheter into a narrow or occluded blood
vessel to recanalize and dilate the vessel by inflating the balloon. The objective of
percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is to improve the blood flow through the
diseased segment of a vessel so that vessel patency is increased and embolization is
decreased. With the development and use of balloon angioplasty for treatment of
atherosclerotic and other vascular stenoses, PTA with and without the placement of a
stent) is a widely used technique for dilating lesions of peripheral, renal, and coronary
arteries.
B. Nationally Covered Indications
The PTA is covered when used under the following conditions:
1. Treatment of Atherosclerotic Obstructive Lesions
-In the lower extremities, i.e., the iliac, femoral, and popliteal arteries, or in the upper
extremities, i.e., the innominate, subclavian, axillary, and brachial arteries. The upper
extremities do not include head or neck vessels.
-Of a single coronary artery for patients for whom the likely alternative treatment is
coronary bypass surgery and who exhibit the following characteristics:
• Angina refractory to optimal medical management;
• Objective evidence of myocardial ischemia; and
• Lesions amenable to angioplasty
-Of the renal arteries for patients in whom there is an inadequate response to a thorough
medical management of symptoms and for whom surgery is the likely alternative. PTA
for this group of patients is an alternative to surgery, not simply an addition to medical
management.
-Of arteriovenous dialysis fistulas and grafts when performed through either a venous or
arterial approach.
2. Concurrent with Carotid Stent Placement in Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)-Approved Category B Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Clinical
Trials
Effective July 1, 2001, Medicare covers PTA of the carotid artery concurrent with carotid
stent placement when furnished in accordance with the FDA-approved protocols
governing Category B IDE clinical trials. PTA of the carotid artery, when provided solely
for the purpose of carotid artery dilation concurrent with carotid stent placement, is
considered to be a reasonable and necessary service when provided in the context of such
a clinical trial.
3. Concurrent with Carotid Stent Placement in FDA-Approved Post-Approval
Studies
Effective October 12, 2004, Medicare covers PTA of the carotid artery concurrent with
the placement of an FDA-approved carotid stent and an FDA-approved or –cleared
embolic protection device (effective December 9, 2009) for an FDA-approved indication
when furnished in accordance with FDA-approved protocols governing post-approval
studies. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) determines that coverage
of PTA of the carotid artery is reasonable and necessary in these circumstances.
4. Concurrent with Carotid Stent Placement
Effective October 11, 2023, CMS covers PTA of the carotid artery concurrent with
stenting with the placement of an FDA-approved carotid stent with an FDA-approved or
cleared embolic protection device, for Medicare beneficiaries under the following
conditions:
A. Patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥50%; and,
B. Patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥70%.
For both A and B above:
1. Neurological assessment by a neurologist or NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) certified
health professional before and after CAS must be performed.
2. First-line evaluation of carotid artery stenosis must use duplex ultrasound.
3. Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography, if not
contraindicated, must be used to confirm the degree of stenosis and provide
additional information about the aortic arch, and extra- and intra-cranial
circulation.
4. Intra-arterial digital subtraction (catheter) angiography may be used only when
there is significant
discrepancy between non-invasive imaging results, or in lieu of computed
tomography angiography or
magnetic resonance angiography if these are contraindicated.
Prior to furnishing CAS, the practitioner must engage in a formal shared decision-making
interaction with the beneficiary. The shared decision-making interaction must include:
• Discussion of all treatment options including carotid endarterectomy (CEA), CAS
(which includes transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and optimal
medical therapy (OMT)).
• Explanation of risks and benefits for each option specific to the beneficiary’s
clinical situation.
• Integration of clinical guidelines (e.g., patient comorbidities and concomitant
treatments).
• Discussion and incorporation of beneficiary’s personal preferences and priorities
in choosing a treatment plan.
Facilities must establish and maintain institutional and physician standards to support a
dedicated carotid stent program. These standards must at least include and ensure the
following:
• Facilities have a clearly delineated program for granting carotid stent privileges
and for monitoring patient outcomes for individual physicians and the program as
a whole.
• The oversight committee for this program shall be empowered to identify the
minimum case volume for a physician to maintain privileges, as well as the (risk-adjusted) threshold for complications that the institution will allow before
suspending privileges or instituting measures for remediation. Committees are
encouraged to apply published standards from specialty societies and widely-used, published professional society guidelines to determine appropriate physician
qualifications.
• Facilities have appropriately trained staff capable of fulfilling roles and
responsibilities as delineated under the dedicated carotid stent program.
• Facilities have appropriate supporting personnel and equipment for imaging,
emergency management, advanced physiologic monitoring, and other ancillary
care.
• Facilities must ensure continuous quality improvement by assessing procedural
outcomes and making necessary programmatic adjustments to assure patient
safety.
5. Concurrent with Intracranial Stent Placement in FDA-Approved Category B IDE
Clinical Trials
Effective November 6, 2006, Medicare covers PTA and stenting of intracranial arteries
for the treatment of cerebral artery stenosis ≥50% in patients with intracranial
atherosclerotic disease when furnished in accordance with the FDA-approved protocols
governing Category B IDE clinical trials. CMS determines that coverage of intracranial
PTA and stenting is reasonable and necessary under these circumstances.
C. Nationally Non-Covered Indications
All other indications for PTA with or without stenting to treat obstructive lesions of the
vertebral and cerebral arteries remain non-covered.
All other indications for PTA without stenting for which CMS has not specifically
indicated coverage remain non-covered.
D. Other
In addition to the national coverage described above, Medicare Administrative
Contractors (MACs) may make reasonable and necessary determinations under section
1862(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act for any other beneficiary seeking coverage for
PTA of the carotid artery concurrent with stenting.
Coverage of PTA with stenting not specifically addressed or discussed in this NCD is at
the discretion of the MACs.
(This NCD last reviewed October 2023)
History
(Rev. 12571; Issued: 04-11-24; Effective: 10-11-23; Implementation: 05-13-24)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
82985da22354b7b72bcd146139f24a7466fa46e70bff2cb88d7cc6bb93e2003f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.