US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 15, § 60.4.1
Definition of Homebound Patient Under the Medicare Home Health (HH)
Benefit
(Rev. 192, Issued: 08-01-14, Effective: 09-02-14, Implementation: 09-02-14)
This definition applies to homebound for purposes of the Medicare home health benefit.
For a patient to be eligible to receive covered home health services, the law requires that a physician certify
in all cases that the patient is confined to his/her home. For purposes of the statute, an individual shall be
considered “confined to the home” (homebound) if the following two criteria are met:
1. Criteria-One:
The patient must either:
- Because of illness or injury, need the aid of supportive devices such as crutches, canes,
wheelchairs, and walkers; the use of special transportation; or the assistance of another person in
order to leave their place of residence
OR
- Have a condition such that leaving his or her home is medically contraindicated.
If the patient meets one of the Criteria-One conditions, then the patient must ALSO meet two additional
requirements defined in Criteria-Two below.
2. Criteria-Two:
- There must exist a normal inability to leave home;
AND
- Leaving home must require a considerable and taxing effort.
If the patient does in fact leave the home, the patient may nevertheless be considered homebound if the
absences from the home are infrequent or for periods of relatively short duration, or are attributable to the
need to receive health care treatment. Absences attributable to the need to receive health care treatment
include, but are not limited to:
• Attendance at adult day centers to receive medical care;
• Ongoing receipt of outpatient kidney dialysis; or
• The receipt of outpatient chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
Any absence of an individual from the home attributable to the need to receive health care treatment,
including regular absences for the purpose of participating in therapeutic, psychosocial, or medical treatment
in an adult day-care program that is licensed or certified by a State, or accredited to furnish adult day-care
services in a state, shall not disqualify an individual from being considered to be confined to his home. Any
other absence of an individual from the home shall not so disqualify an individual if the absence is of an
infrequent or of relatively short duration. For purposes of the preceding sentence, any absence for the
purpose of attending a religious service shall be deemed to be an absence of infrequent or short duration. It
is expected that in most instances, absences from the home that occur will be for the purpose of receiving
health care treatment. However, occasional absences from the home for nonmedical purposes, e.g., an
occasional trip to the barber, a walk around the block or a drive, attendance at a family reunion, funeral,
graduation, or other infrequent or unique event would not necessitate a finding that the patient is not
homebound if the absences are undertaken on an infrequent basis or are of relatively short duration and do
not indicate that the patient has the capacity to obtain the health care provided outside rather than in the
home.
Some examples of homebound patients that illustrate the factors used to determine whether a homebound
condition exists would be:
• A patient paralyzed from a stroke who is confined to a wheelchair or requires the aid of crutches in
order to walk;
• A patient who is blind or senile and requires the assistance of another person in leaving his or her
place of residence;
• A patient who has lost the use of the upper extremities and, therefore, is unable to open doors, use
handrails on stairways, etc., requires the assistance of another individual to leave his or her place of
residence;
• A patient in the late stages of ALS or neurodegenerative disabilities. In determining whether the
patient has the general inability to leave the home and leaves the home only infrequently or for
periods of short duration, it is necessary to look at the patient’s condition over a period of time rather
than for short periods within the home health stay. For example, a patient may leave the home
(under the conditions described above, e.g., with severe and taxing effort, with the assistance of
others) more frequently during a short period when, for example, the presence of visiting relatives
provides a unique opportunity for such absences, than is normally the case. So long as the patient’s
overall condition and experience is such that he or she meets these qualifications, he or she should be
considered confined to the home.
• A patient who has just returned from a hospital stay involving surgery who may be suffering from
resultant weakness and pain and, therefore, his or her actions may be restricted by the physician to
certain specified and limited activities such as getting out of bed only for a specified period of time,
or walking stairs only once a day, etc.;
• A patient with arteriosclerotic heart disease of such severity that the beneficiary must avoid all stress
and physical activity; and
• A patient with a psychiatric illness that is manifested in part by a refusal to leave home or is of such
a nature that it would not be considered safe for the patient to leave home unattended, even if he or
she had no physical limitations.
The aged person who does not often travel from home because of feebleness and insecurity brought on by
advanced age would not be considered confined to the home for purposes of this reimbursement unless they
meet one of the above conditions above.
History
(Rev. 192, Issued: 08-01-14, Effective: 09-02-14, Implementation: 09-02-14)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
1a10ddf4dacc19bc65cb4637284afd18a5d514b22984bff2ff6cdcd444dd104d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.