Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 14, § 20.5

Re-evaluation of an FDA-approved IDE Categorization Decision

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Any sponsor (i.e., manufacturer) that does not agree with the FDA decision that

categorizes its device as Category A may submit a written request asking the FDA to

reevaluate its categorization decision. The sponsor (i.e., a manufacturer) may send a

written request to the FDA at any time asking for a reevaluation of its original

categorization decision, submitting any additional evidence and information which it

believes supports a re-categorization. The FDA notifies both CMS and the sponsor (i.e.,

manufacturer) of its reevaluation decision.

If the FDA reconfirms its original decision on the categorization of the device, the

sponsor (e.g., a manufacturer) may seek a review by the CMS Central Office. The device

sponsor (e.g., a manufacturer) must submit its request in writing, and must include all

materials submitted with its reevaluation request to the FDA. Review requests must be

addressed to:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Attn: IDE Categorization Review

Mail Stop: S3-02-01

Coverage and Analysis Group,

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality,

7500 Security Blvd.

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

The CMS staff will review this information to determine whether to change the

categorization of the device and will issue a written decision notifying both the device

sponsor (e.g., a manufacturer) and the FDA of its decision. In evaluating a

manufacturer’s request for re-categorization, CMS will review only that information

submitted to the FDA. Information not submitted to the FDA for its consideration will

not be reviewed by CMS.

To the extent that CMS relies on confidential commercial or trade secret information in

any judicial proceeding, CMS will maintain confidentiality of the information in

accordance with Federal law.

No reviews of a categorization decision other than those described above are available to

a sponsor (e.g., a manufacturer). Neither the FDA original categorization decision or

reevaluation, nor CMS’ review constitutes an initial determination for purposes of the

Medicare appeals processes under part 405, subpart G or subpart H or parts 417, 473,

or 498 of title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

History

(Rev. 198, Issued: 11-06-14, Effective: 01-01-15, Implementation: 01-05-15)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
60ef7a8eba594fc13f9b77956efb8321b1641774ae26393c83bf94533e3328a8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 14, § 20.5 — Re-evaluation of an… · binding.law