Bindinglaw

US · guidance

CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 8, § 30.1

Administrative Level of Care Presumption

activein force · 2026-08-25 – presentas-observed

Under the SNF PPS, beneficiaries who are admitted (or readmitted) directly to a SNF

after a qualifying hospital stay are considered to meet the level of care requirements of 42

CFR 409.31 up to and including the assessment reference date (ARD) for the initial

Medicare assessment prescribed in 42 CFR 413.343(b), when correctly assigned one of

the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required

level of care. While this assessment is commonly referred to as the “5-day” assessment

(reflecting its original 5-day assessment window), an additional 3 grace days have always

been available beyond that window for actually setting the ARD; further, as of October 1,

2019, those additional 3 grace days are directly incorporated into the assessment window

itself, thus resulting in an overall 8-day assessment window. The current set of case-mix

classifier designations appears in the paragraph entitled “Case Mix Adjustment” on the

SNF PPS web site, at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fe e-for-Service-

Payment/SNFPPS/index.html. If the beneficiary is not admitted (or readmitted) directly

to a SNF after a qualifying hospital stay, the administrative level of care presumption

does not apply.

For purposes of this presumption, the assessment reference date is defined in accordance

with 42 CFR 483.315(d), and must be set for no later than the eighth day of posthospital

SNF care. Consequently, if the ARD for the initial Medicare assessment prescribed in 42

CFR 413.343(b) is set for day 9, or later, the administrative level of care presumption

does not apply. The coverage that arises from this presumption remains in effect only for

as long thereafter as it continues to be supported by the facts of the beneficiary’s

condition and care needs. Accordingly, the SNF is expected to monitor carefully for and

document any changes in the patient’s condition, in order to determine the continuing

need for Part A SNF benefits after the ARD. Moreover, this administrative presumption

does not apply to any subsequent assessments.

To be correctly assigned, the data coded on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)

must be accurate and meet the definitions described in the Long Term Care Facility RAI

User’s Manual. The beneficiary must receive services in the SNF that are reasonable and

necessary. Services provided to the beneficiary during the hospital stay are reviewed to

ensure proper coding of the most recent version of the RAI. The two examples illustrated

below demonstrate a correct assignment and an incorrect assignment.

Incorrect Assignment: IV med provided in hospital coded on MDS, but IV was for a

surgical procedure only – as a consequence, the MDS is not

accurate and the presumption does not apply (see Chapter 3,

Section P of the RAI).

Correct Assignment: Beneficiary is receiving oxygen therapy as well as rehab service.

The respiratory therapy services are found reasonable and

necessary; however, the rehab services are found not reasonable

and necessary, resulting in a revised case-mix classification.

Beneficiary was and is now correctly assigned – presumption

applies.

A beneficiary who is not assigned one of the case-mix classifiers designated as

representing the required level of care on the initial Medicare assessment prescribed in 42

CFR 413.343(b) is not automatically classified as meeting or not meeting the SNF level

of care definition. Instead, the beneficiary must receive an individual level of care

determination using existing administrative criteria and procedures.

The following scenarios further clarify that a beneficiary’s correct assignment of one of

the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required

level of care would serve to trigger the coverage presumption under the initial Medicare

assessment only when that assessment occurs directly following the beneficiary’s

discharge from the qualifying hospital stay (i.e., the hospital discharge and subsequent

SNF admission both occur on the same day).

1. Routine SNF Admission Directly From Qualifying Hospital Stay

If the beneficiary is admitted to the SNF immediately following a 3-day qualifying

hospital stay, there is a presumption that he or she meets the Medicare level of care

criteria when correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for

this purpose as representing the required level of care. The presumption lasts through the

assessment reference date of the initial Medicare assessment, which must be set for no

later than the eighth day of the stay.

2. Admission to SNF does not immediately follow discharge from the qualifying hospital

stay, but occurs within 30 days (as required under the “30 day transfer” rule)

If the beneficiary is discharged from the hospital to a setting other than the SNF, the

presumption of coverage does not apply, even if the beneficiary’s SNF admission occurs

within 30 days of discharge from the qualifying hospital stay. Accordingly, coverage

would be determined based on a review of the medical evidence in the file.

3. SNF Resident is Re-Hospitalized and Then Returns Directly to the SNF

If a beneficiary who has been in a covered Part A stay requires readmission to a hospital,

and subsequently returns directly to the SNF for continuing care, a new initial Medicare

assessment under the regulations at 42 CFR 413.343(b) would be required if the

beneficiary’s absence from the SNF exceeds the 3-day interruption window specified

under the SNF PPS’s interrupted stay policy (see Pub. 100-04, Medicare Claims

Processing Manual, Chapter 6, §120.2). In this scenario, there is a presumption that he or

she meets the level of care criteria upon direct readmission from the hospital to the SNF

when correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this

purpose as representing the required level of care. The resulting presumption of coverage

lasts through the assessment reference date (ARD) of that assessment, which must be set

for no later than the eighth day of the stay. Alternatively, if the absence from the SNF

does not exceed the 3-day interruption window, the beneficiary’s return to the same SNF

would represent a continuation of the previous SNF stay; as such, there would be no new

initial Medicare assessment and no new presumption of coverage; however, any days

remaining from the previous presumption would continue to apply through the ARD of

the original assessment.

4. Routine SNF Admission Directly From Qualifying Hospital Stay, but Initial Portion of

SNF Stay Covered by Another Insurer (Medicare as Secondary Payer)

When a beneficiary goes directly from a qualifying hospital stay to the SNF, but the

initial portion of the SNF stay is covered by another insurer that is primary to Medicare,

Medicare coverage would not start until coverage by the primary insurer ends.

Accordingly, the Medicare required assessment schedule would not begin until the first

day of Medicare coverage. If a beneficiary met the level of care criteria for Medicare

coverage during the first 8 days of the stay following a qualifying hospital stay, and the

other insurer covered this part of the stay, there is no presumption. If Medicare becomes

primary before the eighth day of the stay following a qualifying hospital stay, the

presumption would apply through the assessment reference date on the initial Medicare

assessment or, if earlier, the eighth day of the stay.

5. Readmission to SNF Within 30 Days After Discharge From Initial SNF Stay – No

Intervening Hospitalization

As noted in scenario 1, if a beneficiary is initially admitted to the SNF directly from the

qualifying hospital stay for a covered Part A SNF stay, the presumption for that stay is

applicable when the beneficiary is correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that

CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required level of care. However, if

that beneficiary is discharged to a non-hospital setting and then subsequently readmitted

to the SNF beyond the 3-day interruption window as described in scenario 3 above, there

is no presumption applicable to the second SNF admission. (If the beneficiary is

transferred to a hospital, and returns directly to the SNF, see scenario 3 above).

Alternatively, if the absence from the SNF does not exceed the 3-day interruption

window, the beneficiary’s return to the same SNF would represent a continuation of the

previous SNF stay; as such, any days remaining from the previous presumption would

continue to apply through the ARD of the original assessment.

6. Initial, Non-Medicare SNF Stay Followed by Qualifying Hospitalization and

Readmission to SNF for Medicare Stay

Dually eligible (Medicare/Medicaid) beneficiaries whose initial stay in the SNF is either

Medicaid-covered or private pay, are eligible for the Medicare presumption of coverage

when readmitted directly to the SNF following a qualifying hospitalization, when

correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this purpose as

representing the required level of care. (Of course, in order to qualify for Medicare

coverage upon readmission, the beneficiary must be placed in the portion of the

institution that is actually certified by Medicare as a SNF.) No presumption of coverage

applies when Medicare is the secondary payer for days 1 through 8 of the covered stay

where Medicare becomes primary after day 8 due to a reversal or denial by the secondary

insurer.

7. Transfer From One SNF to Another

There is no presumption of coverage in cases involving the transfer of a beneficiary from

one SNF to another or from SNF-level care in a hospital swing bed to a SNF. The

presumption only applies to the SNF stay that immediately follows the qualifying

hospital stay when the beneficiary is correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers

that CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required level of care.

Therefore, in cases involving transfer of a beneficiary from a swing-bed hospital to a

SNF, the presumption only applies if the beneficiary was receiving acute care (rather than

SNF-level care) immediately prior to discharge from the swing-bed hospital.

History

(Rev. 261, Issued: 10-04-19, Effective: 11-05-19, Implementation: 11-05-19)

Provenance

Source
cms.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-25
Edition
iom-2026-08-25
Content hash
54f2dad2309a216bef9b23851ab566a432282adeeda8008a1450d8570b9b9b10
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.