US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 8, § 30.1
Administrative Level of Care Presumption
Under the SNF PPS, beneficiaries who are admitted (or readmitted) directly to a SNF
after a qualifying hospital stay are considered to meet the level of care requirements of 42
CFR 409.31 up to and including the assessment reference date (ARD) for the initial
Medicare assessment prescribed in 42 CFR 413.343(b), when correctly assigned one of
the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required
level of care. While this assessment is commonly referred to as the “5-day” assessment
(reflecting its original 5-day assessment window), an additional 3 grace days have always
been available beyond that window for actually setting the ARD; further, as of October 1,
2019, those additional 3 grace days are directly incorporated into the assessment window
itself, thus resulting in an overall 8-day assessment window. The current set of case-mix
classifier designations appears in the paragraph entitled “Case Mix Adjustment” on the
SNF PPS web site, at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fe e-for-Service-
Payment/SNFPPS/index.html. If the beneficiary is not admitted (or readmitted) directly
to a SNF after a qualifying hospital stay, the administrative level of care presumption
does not apply.
For purposes of this presumption, the assessment reference date is defined in accordance
with 42 CFR 483.315(d), and must be set for no later than the eighth day of posthospital
SNF care. Consequently, if the ARD for the initial Medicare assessment prescribed in 42
CFR 413.343(b) is set for day 9, or later, the administrative level of care presumption
does not apply. The coverage that arises from this presumption remains in effect only for
as long thereafter as it continues to be supported by the facts of the beneficiary’s
condition and care needs. Accordingly, the SNF is expected to monitor carefully for and
document any changes in the patient’s condition, in order to determine the continuing
need for Part A SNF benefits after the ARD. Moreover, this administrative presumption
does not apply to any subsequent assessments.
To be correctly assigned, the data coded on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)
must be accurate and meet the definitions described in the Long Term Care Facility RAI
User’s Manual. The beneficiary must receive services in the SNF that are reasonable and
necessary. Services provided to the beneficiary during the hospital stay are reviewed to
ensure proper coding of the most recent version of the RAI. The two examples illustrated
below demonstrate a correct assignment and an incorrect assignment.
Incorrect Assignment: IV med provided in hospital coded on MDS, but IV was for a
surgical procedure only – as a consequence, the MDS is not
accurate and the presumption does not apply (see Chapter 3,
Section P of the RAI).
Correct Assignment: Beneficiary is receiving oxygen therapy as well as rehab service.
The respiratory therapy services are found reasonable and
necessary; however, the rehab services are found not reasonable
and necessary, resulting in a revised case-mix classification.
Beneficiary was and is now correctly assigned – presumption
applies.
A beneficiary who is not assigned one of the case-mix classifiers designated as
representing the required level of care on the initial Medicare assessment prescribed in 42
CFR 413.343(b) is not automatically classified as meeting or not meeting the SNF level
of care definition. Instead, the beneficiary must receive an individual level of care
determination using existing administrative criteria and procedures.
The following scenarios further clarify that a beneficiary’s correct assignment of one of
the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required
level of care would serve to trigger the coverage presumption under the initial Medicare
assessment only when that assessment occurs directly following the beneficiary’s
discharge from the qualifying hospital stay (i.e., the hospital discharge and subsequent
SNF admission both occur on the same day).
1. Routine SNF Admission Directly From Qualifying Hospital Stay
If the beneficiary is admitted to the SNF immediately following a 3-day qualifying
hospital stay, there is a presumption that he or she meets the Medicare level of care
criteria when correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for
this purpose as representing the required level of care. The presumption lasts through the
assessment reference date of the initial Medicare assessment, which must be set for no
later than the eighth day of the stay.
2. Admission to SNF does not immediately follow discharge from the qualifying hospital
stay, but occurs within 30 days (as required under the “30 day transfer” rule)
If the beneficiary is discharged from the hospital to a setting other than the SNF, the
presumption of coverage does not apply, even if the beneficiary’s SNF admission occurs
within 30 days of discharge from the qualifying hospital stay. Accordingly, coverage
would be determined based on a review of the medical evidence in the file.
3. SNF Resident is Re-Hospitalized and Then Returns Directly to the SNF
If a beneficiary who has been in a covered Part A stay requires readmission to a hospital,
and subsequently returns directly to the SNF for continuing care, a new initial Medicare
assessment under the regulations at 42 CFR 413.343(b) would be required if the
beneficiary’s absence from the SNF exceeds the 3-day interruption window specified
under the SNF PPS’s interrupted stay policy (see Pub. 100-04, Medicare Claims
Processing Manual, Chapter 6, §120.2). In this scenario, there is a presumption that he or
she meets the level of care criteria upon direct readmission from the hospital to the SNF
when correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this
purpose as representing the required level of care. The resulting presumption of coverage
lasts through the assessment reference date (ARD) of that assessment, which must be set
for no later than the eighth day of the stay. Alternatively, if the absence from the SNF
does not exceed the 3-day interruption window, the beneficiary’s return to the same SNF
would represent a continuation of the previous SNF stay; as such, there would be no new
initial Medicare assessment and no new presumption of coverage; however, any days
remaining from the previous presumption would continue to apply through the ARD of
the original assessment.
4. Routine SNF Admission Directly From Qualifying Hospital Stay, but Initial Portion of
SNF Stay Covered by Another Insurer (Medicare as Secondary Payer)
When a beneficiary goes directly from a qualifying hospital stay to the SNF, but the
initial portion of the SNF stay is covered by another insurer that is primary to Medicare,
Medicare coverage would not start until coverage by the primary insurer ends.
Accordingly, the Medicare required assessment schedule would not begin until the first
day of Medicare coverage. If a beneficiary met the level of care criteria for Medicare
coverage during the first 8 days of the stay following a qualifying hospital stay, and the
other insurer covered this part of the stay, there is no presumption. If Medicare becomes
primary before the eighth day of the stay following a qualifying hospital stay, the
presumption would apply through the assessment reference date on the initial Medicare
assessment or, if earlier, the eighth day of the stay.
5. Readmission to SNF Within 30 Days After Discharge From Initial SNF Stay – No
Intervening Hospitalization
As noted in scenario 1, if a beneficiary is initially admitted to the SNF directly from the
qualifying hospital stay for a covered Part A SNF stay, the presumption for that stay is
applicable when the beneficiary is correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that
CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required level of care. However, if
that beneficiary is discharged to a non-hospital setting and then subsequently readmitted
to the SNF beyond the 3-day interruption window as described in scenario 3 above, there
is no presumption applicable to the second SNF admission. (If the beneficiary is
transferred to a hospital, and returns directly to the SNF, see scenario 3 above).
Alternatively, if the absence from the SNF does not exceed the 3-day interruption
window, the beneficiary’s return to the same SNF would represent a continuation of the
previous SNF stay; as such, any days remaining from the previous presumption would
continue to apply through the ARD of the original assessment.
6. Initial, Non-Medicare SNF Stay Followed by Qualifying Hospitalization and
Readmission to SNF for Medicare Stay
Dually eligible (Medicare/Medicaid) beneficiaries whose initial stay in the SNF is either
Medicaid-covered or private pay, are eligible for the Medicare presumption of coverage
when readmitted directly to the SNF following a qualifying hospitalization, when
correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers that CMS designates for this purpose as
representing the required level of care. (Of course, in order to qualify for Medicare
coverage upon readmission, the beneficiary must be placed in the portion of the
institution that is actually certified by Medicare as a SNF.) No presumption of coverage
applies when Medicare is the secondary payer for days 1 through 8 of the covered stay
where Medicare becomes primary after day 8 due to a reversal or denial by the secondary
insurer.
7. Transfer From One SNF to Another
There is no presumption of coverage in cases involving the transfer of a beneficiary from
one SNF to another or from SNF-level care in a hospital swing bed to a SNF. The
presumption only applies to the SNF stay that immediately follows the qualifying
hospital stay when the beneficiary is correctly assigned one of the case-mix classifiers
that CMS designates for this purpose as representing the required level of care.
Therefore, in cases involving transfer of a beneficiary from a swing-bed hospital to a
SNF, the presumption only applies if the beneficiary was receiving acute care (rather than
SNF-level care) immediately prior to discharge from the swing-bed hospital.
History
(Rev. 261, Issued: 10-04-19, Effective: 11-05-19, Implementation: 11-05-19)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
54f2dad2309a216bef9b23851ab566a432282adeeda8008a1450d8570b9b9b10
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.