US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 8, § 20.1
Three-Day Prior Hospitalization
In accordance with section 226(c)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act and the implementing
regulations at 42 CFR 409.30(a)(2), the hospital discharge must have occurred on or after
the first day of the month in which the individual attained age 65 or, effective July 1,
1973, became entitled to health insurance benefits under the disability or chronic renal
disease provisions of the law. The 3 consecutive calendar day stay requirement can be
met by stays totaling 3 consecutive days in one or more hospitals. In determining
whether the requirement has been met, the day of admission, but not the day of discharge,
is counted as a hospital inpatient day.
Time spent in observation or in the emergency room prior to (or in lieu of) an inpatient
admission to the hospital does not count toward the 3-day qualifying inpatient hospital
stay, as a person who appears at a hospital’s emergency room seeking examination or
treatment or is placed on observation has not been admitted to the hospital as an
inpatient; instead, the person receives outpatient services. For purposes of the SNF
benefit’s qualifying hospital stay requirement, inpatient status commences with the
calendar day of hospital admission. See 31 Fed. Reg. 10116, 10118-19 (July 27, 1966).
To be covered, the extended care services must have been for the treatment of a condition
for which the beneficiary was receiving inpatient hospital services (including services of
an emergency hospital) or a condition which arose while in the SNF for treatment of a
condition for which the beneficiary was previously hospitalized. In this context, the
applicable hospital condition need not have been the principal diagnosis that actually
precipitated the beneficiary’s admission to the hospital, but could be any one of the
conditions present during the qualifying hospital stay.
In addition, the qualifying hospital stay must have been medically necessary. Medical
necessity will generally be presumed to exist. When the facts that come to the A/B
MACs (A) attention during the course of its normal claims review process indicate that
the hospitalization may not have been medically necessary, it will fully develop the case,
checking with the attending physician and the hospital, as appropriate. The A/B MAC
will rule the stay unnecessary only when hospitalization for 3 days represents a
substantial departure from normal medical practice. However, in accordance with Pub.
100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 30, §130.2.A, when a beneficiary
qualifies for limitation on liability in connection with the hospital stay (or a portion
thereof), this conclusively establishes that the hospital stay (or portion thereof) was not
medically necessary.
Even if a beneficiary’s care during a qualifying hospital stay becomes less intensive
during the latter part of the stay, the date of hospital “discharge” in this context is still
considered to be the day that the beneficiary physically leaves the hospital, and the level
of care being furnished at that particular point is not a determining factor as long as some
portion of the stay included at least 3 consecutive days of medically necessary inpatient
hospital services. In addition, when a hospital inpatient’s care needs drop from acute- to
SNF-level but no SNF bed is available, the regulations at 42 CFR 424.13(c) permit a
physician to certify that the beneficiary’s continued inpatient stay in the hospital is, in
fact, medically necessary under this particular set of circumstances (see also Pub. 100-01,
Medicare General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement Manual, Chapter 4, §10.6).
Accordingly, such additional, “alternate placement” days spent in the hospital can be
included in the 3-day count toward meeting the SNF benefit’s qualifying hospital stay
requirement.
The 3-day hospital stay need not be in a hospital with which the SNF has a transfer
agreement (see Pub. 100-01, Medicare General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement
Manual, Chapter 5, §30.2 for a discussion of the SNF’s required transfer agreement with
a hospital). However, the hospital must be either a Medicare-participating hospital or an
institution that meets at least the conditions of participation for an emergency services
hospital (see Pub. 100-01, Medicare General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement
Manual, Chapter 5, §20.2, for the definition of an emergency services hospital). A
nonparticipating psychiatric hospital need not meet the special requirements applicable to
psychiatric hospitals (see Pub. 100-01, Medicare General Information, Eligibility, and
Entitlement Manual, Chapter 5, §20.3). Stays in Religious Nonmedical Health Care
Institutions (see Pub. 100-01, Medicare General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement
Manual, Chapter 5, §40, for definition of RNHCIs) are excluded for the purpose of
satisfying the 3-day period of hospitalization. See Pub. 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy
Manual, Chapter 9, §40.1.5, regarding a qualifying stay that consists of “general inpatient
care” furnished in a hospital under the hospice benefit.
NOTE: While a 3-day stay in a psychiatric hospital satisfies the prior hospital stay
requirement, institutions that primarily provide psychiatric treatment cannot participate in
the program as SNFs. Therefore, a patient with only a psychiatric condition who is
transferred from a psychiatric hospital to a participating SNF is likely to receive only
non-covered care. In the SNF setting, the term “non-covered care” refers to any level of
care less intensive than the SNF level of care that is covered under the program. (See
§§30ff.).
History
(Rev. 10880, Issued: 08-06-21, Effective: 11-08-21, Implementation: 11-08-21)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
ea67c3d0576cbcfe62223a5630823de97bb947c6c26c3e478ec82112a531f033
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.