US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 2, § 30.2.2.1
Principles for Evaluating a Period of Active Treatment
In the context of IPF services, emphasis is placed on the presence of active treatment and,
therefore, this determination is the crucial one. Simply applying the skilled care
definition for general hospitals is not sufficient for determining whether payment may be
made since that definition does not take into account the patient's potential for
improvement nor was it designed to permit the more sophisticated judgments required by
the concept of active treatment. For services in an IPF to be designated as active
treatment, they must be:
• Provided under an individualized treatment or diagnostic plan;
• Reasonably expected to improve the patient's condition or for the purpose of
diagnosis; and
• Supervised and evaluated by a physician.
Such factors as diagnosis, length of hospitalization, and the degree of functional
limitation, while useful as general indicators of the kind of care most likely being
furnished in a given situation, are not controlling in deciding whether the care was active
treatment. Refer to 42 CFR 482.61, Conditions of Participation for Hospitals, for a full
description of what constitutes active treatment.
The period of time covered by the physician's certification is referred to as a period of
active treatment. This period should include all days on which inpatient psychiatric
facility services were provided because of the individual's need for active treatment (not
just the days on which specific therapeutic or diagnostic services are rendered). For
example, a patient's program of treatment may necessitate the discontinuance of therapy
for a period of time or it may include a period of observation, either in preparation for or
as a follow-up to therapy, while only maintenance or protective services are furnished. If
such periods were essential to the overall treatment plan, they would be regarded as part
of the period of active treatment.
The fact that a patient is under the supervision of a physician does not necessarily mean
the patient is getting active treatment. For example, medical supervision of a patient may
be necessary to assure the early detection of significant changes in his/her condition;
however, in the absence of a specific program of therapy designed to effect improvement,
a finding that the patient is receiving active treatment would be precluded.
The program's definition of active treatment does not automatically exclude from
coverage services rendered to patients who have conditions that ordinarily result in
progressive physical and/or mental deterioration. Although patients with such diagnosis
will most commonly be receiving custodial care, they may also receive services that meet
the program's definition of active treatment (e.g., where a patient with Alzheimer's
disease or Pick's disease received services designed to alleviate the effects of paralysis,
epileptic seizures, or some other neurological symptom, or where a patient in the terminal
stages of any disease received life-supportive care). A period of hospitalization during
which services of this kind were furnished would be regarded as a period of active
treatment.
History
(Rev. 59, Issued: 11-09-06, Effective: 01-01-05, Implementation: 12-04-06)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
943ccc3a2cbd35be32dcda40d0716baa6a4cc12238c65fc1c556290c5a9917a8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.