US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-02, ch. 1, § 110.2.2
Intensive Level of Rehabilitation Services
A primary distinction between the IRF environment and other rehabilitation settings is
the intensity of rehabilitation therapy services provided in an IRF. For this reason, the
information in the patient’s IRF medical record (especially the required documentation
described in section 110.1) must document a reasonable expectation that at the time of
admission to the IRF the patient generally required the intensive rehabilitation therapy
services that are uniquely provided in IRFs. Although the intensity of rehabilitation
services can be reflected in various ways, the generally-accepted standard by which the
intensity of these services is typically demonstrated in IRFs is by the provision of
intensive therapies at least 3 hours per day at least 5 days per week. However, this is not
the only way that such intensity of services can be demonstrated (that is, CMS does not
intend for this measure to be used as a “rule of thumb” for determining whether a
particular IRF claim is reasonable and necessary).
The intensity of therapy services provided in IRFs could also be demonstrated by the
provision of 15 hours of therapy per week (that is, in a 7-consecutive calendar day period
starting from the date of admission). For example, if a hypothetical IRF patient was
admitted to an IRF for a hip fracture, but was also undergoing chemotherapy for an
unrelated issue, the patient might not be able to tolerate therapy on a predictable basis due
to the chemotherapy. Thus, this hypothetical patient might be more effectively served by
the provision of 4 hours of therapy 3 days per week and 1 ½ hours of therapy on 2 (or
more) other days per week in order to accommodate his or her chemotherapy schedule.
Thus, IRFs may also demonstrate a patient’s need for intensive rehabilitation therapy
services by showing that the patient required and could reasonably be expected to benefit
from at least 15 hours of therapy per week (defined as a 7-consecutve calendar day
period starting from the date of admission), as long as the reasons for the patient’s need
for this program of intensive rehabilitation are well-documented in the patient’s IRF
medical record and the overall amount of therapy can reasonably be expected to benefit
the patient. Many IRF patients will medically benefit from more than 3 hours of therapy
per day or more than 15 hours of therapy per week, when all types of therapy are
considered. However, the intensity of therapy provided must be reasonable and
necessary under section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the Act and must never exceed the patient’s
level of need or tolerance, or compromise the patient’s safety. See below for a brief
exceptions policy for temporary and unexpected events.
In accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(3)(ii), the required therapy treatments must
begin within 36 hours from midnight of the day of admission to the IRF. Therapy
evaluations are generally considered to constitute the beginning of the required therapy
services. As such, they should generally be included in the total daily/weekly provision
of therapies used to demonstrate the intensity of therapy services provided in an IRF.
The standard of care for IRF patients is individualized (i.e., one-on-one) therapy. Group
therapies serve as an adjunct to individual therapies. In those instances in which group
therapy better meets the patient’s needs on a limited basis, the situation/rationale that
justifies group therapy should be specified in the patient’s medical record at the IRF.
Brief Exceptions Policy - While patients requiring an IRF stay are expected to need and
receive an intensive rehabilitation therapy program, as described above, this may not be
true for a limited number of days during a patient’s IRF stay because patients’ needs vary
over time. For example, if an unexpected clinical event occurs during the course of a
patient’s IRF stay that limits the patient’s ability to participate in the intensive therapy
program for a brief period not to exceed 3 consecutive days (e.g., extensive diagnostic
tests off premises, prolonged intravenous infusion of chemotherapy or blood products,
bed rest due to signs of deep vein thrombosis, exhaustion due to recent ambulance
transportation, surgical procedure, etc.), the specific reasons for the break in the provision
of therapy services should generally be documented in the patient’s IRF medical record.
If these reasons are appropriately documented in the patient’s IRF medical record, such a
break in service (of limited duration) should generally not affect the determination of the
medical necessity of the IRF admission. Thus, A/B MACs (A) may consider approving
brief exceptions to the intensity of therapy requirement in these particular cases if they
determine that the initial expectation of the patient’s active participation in intensive
therapy during the IRF stay was based on a diligent preadmission screening, post-admission physician evaluation, and overall plan of care that were based on reasonable
conclusions.
History
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
10ae4cdb331ddac231fd39011fae06c6d7f39ef1adc2d8c088cc34c28237ea02
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.