US · guidance
CMS Pub. 100-01, ch. 5, § 70.5
Optometrists
A. Services Furnished Through March 31, 1987
Prior to April 1, 1987, a doctor of optometry who was legally authorized to practice
optometry by the State in which he or she performed such a function was considered a
physician under Medicare, but only for the purpose of services related to the condition of
aphakia. Aphakia is defined as the absence of the natural crystalline lens of the eye,
whether or not an intraocular lens has been implanted. The services performed by
optometrists within this definition were subject to limitations set by the State relating to
the scope of practice of optometry.
The following are examples of examination services which were covered when furnished
by optometrists if related to the condition of aphakia: case history, external examination,
ophthalmoscopy, biomicroscopy, tonometry, visual fields, ocular motility, binocular
function, and evaluation for contact lenses, if the optometrist furnishing these services is
legally authorized to perform them.
B. Services Furnished After March 31, 1987
Effective April 1, 1987, a doctor of optometry is considered a physician with respect to
all services the optometrist is authorized to perform under State law or regulation. To be
covered under Medicare, the services must be medically reasonable and necessary for the
diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury, and must meet all applicable coverage
requirements. (See Benefit Policy Manual for information concerning exclusions from
coverage that apply to vision care services.)
History
(Rev. 1, 09-11-02)
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-25
- Edition
- iom-2026-08-25
- Content hash
90081f686eb546c7c27ec3aebfc7ccd243f203c0c627a11ca7c37097901d35b2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.