US-CA9 · jury_instructions
9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.29
Particular Rights—Eighth Amendment—Convicted
Prisoner’s Claim of Excessive Force
As previously explained, the plaintiff [name] has the burden of proving that the act[s] of the defendant [name] deprived the plaintiff [name] of particular rights under the United States Constitution. In this case, the plaintiff [name] alleges the defendant [name] deprived [him] [her] [other pronoun] of [his] [her] [other pronoun] rights under the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution when [insert factual basis of the plaintiff’s claim].
Under the Eighth Amendment, a convicted prisoner has the right to be free from “cruel and unusual punishments.” To establish the defendant [name] deprived the plaintiff [name] of this Eighth Amendment right, the plaintiff [name] must prove the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence:
First, the defendant [name] used excessive and unnecessary force under all of the circumstances;
Second, the defendant [name] acted maliciously and sadistically for the purpose of causing harm, and not in a good faith effort to maintain or restore discipline; and
Third, the act[s] of the defendant [name] caused harm to the plaintiff [name].
In determining whether these three elements have been met in this case, consider the following factors:
(1) the extent of the injury suffered;
(2) the need to use force;
(3) the relationship between the need to use force and the amount of force used;
(4) any threat reasonably perceived by the defendant; and
(5) any efforts made to temper the severity of a forceful response, such as, if feasible,
providing a prior warning or giving an order to comply.
Provenance
- Source
- ce9.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
d5528cc12cc812688acbb65e02bd67079c64039b53abac6e3470cd85550a25b6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.