Bindinglaw

US-CA9 · jury_instructions

9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 17.26

Copyright—Affirmative Defense—Implied License

activein force · 2026-08-20 – presentas-observed

The defendant [name] contends that [he] [she] [other pronoun] is not liable for copyright infringement because the plaintiff [name] granted [him] [her] [other pronoun] an implied license in the plaintiff [name]’s copyrighted work. The plaintiff [name] cannot claim copyright infringement against a defendant [name] who [copies] [distributes] [uses] [modifies] [retains] the plaintiff [name]’s copyrighted work if the plaintiff [name] granted the defendant [name] an implied license to [copy] [distribute] [use] [modify] [retain] the work.

To show the existence of an implied license, the defendant has the burden of proving that:

First, the defendant [name] requested that the plaintiff [name] create a work;

Second, the plaintiff [name] made that particular work and delivered it to the defendant; and

Third, the plaintiff [name] intended that the defendant [name] [[copy] [distribute] [use] [modify] [retain]] the plaintiff [name]’s work.

If you find that the defendant [name] has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff [name] granted [him] [her] [other pronoun] an implied license to [copy] [distribute] [use] [modify] [retain] the copyrighted work, your verdict should be for the defendant [name] [on that portion of the plaintiff [name]’s copyright infringement claim].

Provenance

Source
ce9.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
41c506fa8b46c5cf768310a825092bd6cfef21b73752fff53c0fe5d02c365c8e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 17.26 · binding.law