Bindinglaw

US-CA9 · jury_instructions

9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 15.9

Infringement—Elements—Validity—Unregistered Marks

activein force · 2026-08-20 – presentas-observed

[Describe plaintiff’s alleged trademark] is not registered. Unregistered trademarks can be valid and provide the trademark owner with the exclusive right to use that mark. Instruction [insert number of instruction regarding Trademark Elements and Burden of Proof, e.g., 15.6] requires the plaintiff to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that [describe plaintiff’s alleged trademark] is valid. A valid trademark is a [word, name, symbol, device, or any combination of these items] that is either:

(1) inherently distinctive; or

(2) descriptive but has acquired a secondary meaning.

[Only a valid trademark can be infringed.] [Only if you determine plaintiff proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the [describe plaintiff [name]’s alleged trademark] is a valid trademark should you consider whether plaintiff [name] owns it or whether defendant [name]’s actions infringed it.]

Only if you determine that [describe plaintiff [name]’s alleged trademark] is not inherently distinctive should you consider whether it is descriptive but became distinctive through the development of secondary meaning, as I will direct in Instruction [insert number of instruction regarding Distinctiveness and Secondary Meaning, e.g., 15.11].

Provenance

Source
ce9.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
17de0ef35accfd97fc3d57398c7a2a7752ab6550520e2520d06aed0381a15880
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.