US-CA9 · jury_instructions
9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 13.1
Employee Claim Against Union and/or Employer—Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) § 301 (29 U.S.C. § 185)
To prevail, the plaintiff [name] must prove each of the following by a preponderance of the evidence:
First, that the plaintiff was discharged from employment by [name of employer];
Second, that such discharge was without “just cause”;
Third, that the plaintiff filed a grievance with [name of union]; and
Fourth, that [name of union] breached its duty to fairly represent the plaintiff’s interests under the collective bargaining agreement by handling the grievance proceedings arbitrarily, discriminatorily, or in bad faith.
The plaintiff [name] must prove all four of the elements listed above whether [he] [she] [other pronoun] is suing the union, the employer, or both. In this case, the plaintiff [name] is suing [the union] [the employer] [both the union and the employer].
If you find that the plaintiff [name] has proved all four of the elements listed above, your verdict should be for the plaintiff [name]. If, on the other hand, the plaintiff [name] has failed to prove any of these elements, your verdict should be for the defendant [name].
Under the law, an employer may not discharge an employee governed by a collective bargaining agreement, such as the one involved in this case, unless “just cause” exists for the employee’s dismissal. The term “just cause” means a real cause or basis for dismissal as distinguished from an arbitrary whim or caprice; that is, some cause or ground that a reasonable employer, acting in good faith in similar circumstances, would regard as a good and sufficient basis for terminating the services of an employee.
A union has a duty under the law to represent fairly the interests of its members in protecting their rights under a collective bargaining agreement. However, an individual employee does not have an absolute right to require the employee’s union to pursue a grievance against the employer. A union has considerable discretion in controlling the grievance and arbitration procedure. The question is not whether the employee is satisfied with the union representation or whether that representation was perfect.
Breach of the duty of fair representation occurs only when a union acting in bad faith or in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner fails to process a meritorious grievance. So long as the union acts in good faith, it may exercise its discretion in determining whether to pursue or process an employee’s grievance against the employer. Even if an employee’s grievance has merit, the union’s mere negligence or its exercise of poor judgment does not constitute a breach of its duty of fair representation.
Provenance
- Source
- ce9.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
63d6f0b93f93175fa03c89ba32a50bde7c1033cb288ac2a0151aa3cf36f3fbcb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.