US-CA9 · jury_instructions
9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 12.8
ADA—Ability to Perform Essential Functions—Factors
“An essential function of an employment position” means the fundamental job duties of the employment position that the plaintiff holds or desires. It does not include the marginal functions that may occur through the course of a job.
You must consider the employer’s judgment as to what functions of a job are essential. If any employer has prepared a written description before advertising or interviewing applicants for the job, this description is evidence of the essential functions of the job.
Other factors that may bear upon whether a job function is essential include, but are not limited to:
(1) [whether the reason the position exists is to perform that function][;]
(2) [whether there are a limited number of employees available among whom the performance of that job function can be distributed][;]
(3) [whether the job function is highly specialized, and the person in that particular position is hired for [his] [her] [other pronoun] expertise or ability to perform the particular function][;]
(4) [the amount of time spent performing the job function][;]
(5) [the consequences of not requiring the individual holding the position to perform the function][;]
(6) [the terms of any collective bargaining agreement][;]
(7) [the work experience of past employees who have held the position][;] [and]
(8) [the work experience of current employees who hold similar positions].
Provenance
- Source
- ce9.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
e3d1dbf99b0c3611bbdb7dfb105acdb1c74409347fb9d941dce3cc234802cd9a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.