US-CA9 · jury_instructions
9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 11.1
Age Discrimination—Disparate Treatment—Elements and Burden of Proof
The plaintiff [name] has brought a claim of employment discrimination against the defendant [name]. The plaintiff [name] asserts the defendant [name] [discharged] [specify other adverse action] the plaintiff [name] because of [his] [her] [other pronoun] age. The defendant [name] denies that the plaintiff [name] was [discharged] [specify other adverse action] because of [his] [her] [other pronoun] age [and further asserts the decision to [discharge] [specify other adverse action] the plaintiff [name] was based on [a] lawful reason[s]].
To prevail on this claim, the plaintiff [name] has the burden of proving each of the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence:
First, the defendant [name] [discharged] [specify other adverse action] the plaintiff [name];
Second, the plaintiff [name] was 40 years of age or older at the time [he] [she] [other pronoun] was [discharged] [specify other adverse action]; and
Third, the defendant [name] [discharged] [specify other adverse action] the plaintiff [name] because of [his] [her] [other pronoun] age, that is, the defendant [name] would not have [discharged] [specify other adverse action] the plaintiff [name] but for [his] [her] [other pronoun] age.
If you find that the plaintiff [name] has proved all three of these elements, your verdict should be for the plaintiff [name]. If, on the other hand, the plaintiff [name] has failed to prove any of these elements, your verdict should be for the defendant [name].
Provenance
- Source
- ce9.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
f0d6af5cb9235a42c3a2274458d55d34eb9aab3de543818b26fead7e720c1967
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.