Bindinglaw

US-CA9 · jury_instructions

9th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 10.1

Civil Rights—Title VII—Disparate Treatment—Without

activein force · 2026-08-20 – presentas-observed

Affirmative Defense of “Same Decision”

For the plaintiff [name]’s claim that [he] [she] [other pronoun] was [discharged] [not hired] [not promoted] [demoted] [state other adverse action] by the defendant [name] because of the plaintiff [name]’s [race] [color] [religion] [sex] [national origin], the plaintiff [name] has the burden of proving the following elements by a preponderance of the evidence:

First, the plaintiff [name] was [discharged] [not hired] [not promoted] [demoted] [state other adverse action] by the defendant [name]; [and]

Second, the defendant [name] [discharged] [failed to hire] [failed to promote] [demoted] [state other adverse action] the plaintiff [name] because of the plaintiff [name]’s [race] [color] [religion] [sex] [national origin] [.] [;]

[Third, the plaintiff [name] was qualified for [his] [her] [other pronoun] position [.] [;] [and]

[Fourth, similarly situated individuals outside the plaintiff [name]’s [race] [color] [religion] [sex] [national origin] were treated more favorably.]

If the plaintiff [name] has proven each of these elements by a preponderance of the evidence, the plaintiff [name] is entitled to your verdict.

Provenance

Source
ce9.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
5f92c59cef6846f915e2fdd1bc46c4bae6a83744954ab31db950cdf353c8d25f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.