US-CA8 · jury_instructions
8th Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Criminal) 12.08
Nonstatutory Aggravating Factors
[If you have found the existence of one or more statutory aggravating factors unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt, you must then consider whether the [government] [prosecution] has proved the existence of [a] [any] nonstatutory aggravating factor[s]. As in the case for statutory aggravating factors, you must unanimously agree that the [government] [prosecution] has proved beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of [any of] the alleged nonstatutory aggravating factor[s]1 [and that [the] [those] factor[s] tend[s] to support imposition of the death penalty] before you may consider such factor[s] in your deliberations on the appropriate punishment for the defendant in this case.
In addition to any statutory aggravating factors you have found, you are permitted to consider and discuss only the nonstatutory aggravating factor[s] specifically alleged by the [government] [prosecution] and listed below. [You must not consider any other facts in aggravation which you think of on your own.]
The [first] nonstatutory aggravating factor[s] alleged by the [government] [prosecution] [is] [are] that (the following are examples – list as appropriate):
The defendant participated in additional uncharged murders, attempted murders, or other serious crimes of violence (describe pertinent facts).2, [and his participation in those acts tends to support imposition of the death penalty].3
The defendant would be a danger in the future to the lives and safety of other persons,4 as evidenced by (describe pertinent facts):
specific threats of violence,5
continuing pattern of violence,6
low rehabilitative potential,7
lack of remorse,8
mental evaluation, i.e., psychopathic personality,9
custody classification, and/or
other.
[and his dangerousness tends to support imposition of the death penalty].10
The defendant obstructed a criminal investigation, tampered with or retaliated against a witness, (describe pertinent facts),11 [and that [obstruction] [tampering] [retaliation] tends to support imposition of the death penalty].12
[Victim impact—the wording of this aggravator must be tailored to the facts of the case.]13
At this point you must record your findings regarding whether you unanimously find that the [government] [prosecution] has proven beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of [this] [any of these] nonstatutory aggravating factor[s] [with respect to the same murder]. Please enter that finding on [the appropriate] page [_____] of Section III(IV) of the Special Verdict Form, and continue your deliberations.
Provenance
- Source
- juryinstructions.ca8.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
bf7686915f79ab5aa08dbcd7fee2fd41718148989743f5f1f9505832615c7b8b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.