Bindinglaw

US-CA6 · jury_instructions

6th Cir. Pattern Crim. Jury Instr. 14.07C

UNANIMITY REQUIRED – DETERMINING WHETHER DEATH OR SERIOUS BODILY INJURY RESULTED FROM DISTRIBUTING/DISPENSING OR MANUFACTURING (§ 841) AND SPECIAL VERDICT FORM

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

(1) The defendant is charged in Count ____ of the indictment with [distributing/dispensing] [manufacturing] [name controlled substance]. If you find the defendant guilty of this charge, you will then be asked to determine whether this [distributing/dispensing] [manufacturing] offense resulted in [death] [serious bodily injury]. You will be provided with a special verdict form to answer this question.

(2) For you to find defendant guilty of [distributing/dispensing] [manufacturing] [name controlled substance] resulting in [death] [serious bodily injury], you must find that the government has proved each and every one of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

(A) First, that [name of person injured/deceased] would not have [sustained serious bodily injury] [died] but for the use of that same [name controlled substance] [distributed/dispensed] [manufactured] by the defendant;

[(B) Second, the defendant was part of the of the distribution chain that placed the [name controlled substance] into the hands of [name of person injured/deceased].]

(3) Now I will give you more detailed instructions on some of these terms.

(A) But-for causation means that without using the controlled substance [distributed/dispensed] [manufactured] by the defendant, [name of person injured/deceased] would not have [sustained serious bodily injury] [died]. The government need not prove that [serious bodily injury] [death] was foreseeable to the defendant.

[(B) The term “serious bodily injury” means bodily injury which involves [insert at least one from the options below]

[a substantial risk of death] or

[protracted and obvious disfigurement] or

[protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty]].

(4) If you find by unanimous agreement that the government has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the [distributing/dispensing] [manufacturing] resulted in [death] [serious bodily injury], then please indicate this finding by checking that line on the verdict form.

Use Note

This instruction explains the requirements of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Alleyne v. United States, 133 S.Ct. 2151 (2013) in a prosecution for distributing or dispensing, or manufacturing, a controlled substance under § 841 when death or serious bodily injury results. In these cases, the committee recommends that the court give this instruction and use a special verdict form, provided below following the commentary.

Bracketed paragraph (2)(B) should be used if the defendant's liability for the offense of distributing or dispensing, or manufacturing, a controlled substance is based on being part of a conspiracy under Pinkerton, but if the defendant's liability for distributing or dispensing, or manufacturing, is based on his own actions, the court may omit paragraph (2)(B). This is discussed in the commentary below.

Bracketed paragraph (3)(B) defining serious bodily injury may be deleted if the question is not raised by the facts.

Like the instruction, the special verdict form may be edited depending on whether the facts of the case raise the issue of death or serious bodily injury.

Provenance

Source
ca6.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-19
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
fc9081a169ad584219ee8df894432751a2e82ccb905cf88c4daa74b77c3b786f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
6th Cir. Pattern Crim. Jury Instr. 14.07C · binding.law