US-CA6 · jury_instructions
6th Cir. Pattern Crim. Jury Instr. 14.04
POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE (21 U.S.C. § 844)
(1) The defendant is charged with the crime of possessing [name controlled substance]. [Name controlled substance] is a controlled substance. For you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, you must find that the government has proved each and every one of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(A) First, the defendant possessed [name controlled substance].
(B) Second, the defendant did so knowingly [or intentionally].
(2) Now I will give you more detailed instructions on some of these terms.
(A) [Insert applicable definition of possession from Instructions 2.10, 2.10A, and 2.11 here or as a separate instruction].
(B) To prove that the defendant “knowingly” possessed the [name controlled substance], the defendant does not have to know that the substance was [name controlled substance]. It is enough that the defendant knew that it was some kind of controlled substance. Further, the defendant did not have to know how much [name controlled substance] he possessed. It is enough that the defendant knew that he possessed some quantity of [name controlled substance].
(3) If you are convinced that the government has proved all of these elements, say so by returning a guilty verdict on this charge. If you have a reasonable doubt about any one of these elements, then you must find the defendant not guilty of this charge.
Provenance
- Source
- ca6.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
1c9a74b840e0f3f6beba581528db739f241336b3d915d3b98171ce32ae6dbdc1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.