US-CA5 · jury_instructions
5th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 2.91B
TRAFFICKING IN GOODS OR SERVICES BEARING A COUNTERFEIT
MARK LIKELY TO CAUSE CONFUSION, MISTAKE, OR DECEPTION
18 U.S.C. § 2320(a)(2)
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2320 makes it a crime for a person to intentionally
traffic [attempt to traffic] [conspire to traffic] in certain goods knowing that a counterfeit mark has
been applied thereto that is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, you must be convinced that the
government has proved each of the following beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: That the defendant trafficked in labels, patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, emblems,
medallions, charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, hangtags, documentation, or packaging of any
type or nature to which a counterfeit mark has been applied;
Second: That the use of the counterfeit mark is likely to cause confusion [to cause mistake]
[to deceive];
Third: That the defendant knows that the mark is counterfeit and that its use is likely to
cause confusion [to cause mistake] [to deceive]; and
Fourth: That such trafficking was intentional.
“Traffic” means to transport, transfer, or dispose of, to another, for purposes of commercial
advantage or private financial gain, or to import, export, obtain control of, or possess with intent
to do transport, transfer, or otherwise dispose of.
“Financial gain” includes the receipt, or expected receipt, of anything of value.
Provenance
- Source
- lb5.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
1292c7e8c48521b43d6cf09e665f28dd1e953550f3f28ce1c046995c8a381230
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.