US-CA5 · jury_instructions
5th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 2.88
RECEIPT OF A STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLE, VESSEL, OR AIRCRAFT
18 U.S.C. § 2313
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2313, makes it a crime for anyone to receive any
motor vehicle, vessel, or aircraft which has crossed a state or United States boundary after being
stolen, knowing it to have been stolen.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, you must be convinced that the
government has proved each of the following beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: That the motor vehicle [vessel] [aircraft] in question was stolen;
Second: That the motor vehicle [vessel] [aircraft] had crossed a state or United States
boundary after being stolen;
Third: That the defendant received the stolen motor vehicle [vessel] [aircraft]; and
Fourth: That the defendant knew the motor vehicle [vessel] [aircraft] to have been stolen
at the time the defendant received it.
Before a defendant can be convicted of the offense charged, the government must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew that the property had been stolen, but it is not
required to prove that the defendant knew that the property had crossed a state or United States
boundary after being stolen.
The word “stolen” means all wrongful and dishonest takings of motor vehicles, vessels, or
aircrafts with the intent to deprive the owner, temporarily or permanently, of the rights and benefits
of ownership.
Provenance
- Source
- lb5.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
57053dd786973df274c9af2b3c4cd650c6610d249ce93c5c84c982fe1df28570
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.