US-CA5 · jury_instructions
5th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 2.71
EMBEZZLEMENT/THEFT OF MAIL MATTER BY POSTAL SERVICE
EMPLOYEE
18 U.S.C. § 1709
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1709, makes it a crime for a Postal Service employee
to embezzle any mail matter possessed by the employee during employment.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this crime, you must be convinced that the
government has proved each of the following beyond a reasonable doubt:
First: That the defendant was a Postal Service employee at the time stated in the indictment;
Second: That, as a Postal Service employee, the defendant had been entrusted with [had
lawfully come into possession of] the mail matter described in the indictment, which mail matter
was intended to be conveyed by mail; and
Third: That the defendant embezzled mail matter.
A letter is “intended to be conveyed by mail” if a reasonable person who saw the letter
would think it was a letter intended to be delivered through the mail.
The fact that a particular letter may have been a “decoy” letter which was not meant to go
anywhere would not prevent your finding that it was intended to be conveyed by mail if a
reasonable person who saw the letter would think it was a normal letter which was intended to be
delivered.
To “embezzle” means to wrongfully and intentionally take money or property of another
after the money or property has lawfully come into the possession or control of the person taking
it.
Provenance
- Source
- lb5.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
ddd4687e7c2be7fa6225fb8b4567b117ef9bf805884d128bcd9d0eccdd08ac2b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.