US-CA5 · jury_instructions
5th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 12.1
Reasonable Compensation to Stockholder—
Employee
Plaintiff [name] is entitled to certain tax deductions that are ordinary and necessary business expenses, such as reasonable salaries or other compensation
paid for personal services actually rendered. A corporation, however, is not entitled to a deduction for dividends it pays to its shareholders. Dividends a corporation pays to its shareholders are a distribution of
profits, not deductible expenses.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue must disallow any portion of a compensation deduction that the
Commissioner believes is (1) not compensation or (2)
unreasonable in amount. This prevents a corporation
from improperly reducing its taxes by distributing all
or some of its profits to its shareholders and calling the
distribution something else, like salaries.
You must decide whether Plaintiff [name] may
deduct on its federal income tax returns certain
amounts it says it paid as salaries for the years
involved. To be entitled to the salary deduction claims,
Plaintiff [name] must establish each of the following
elements by a preponderance of the evidence:
1. that the payments were actually paid as compensation for services rendered and were not a
distribution of the profits of the business; and
2. that the payments are reasonable when compared with the personal services actually
rendered.
The fact that Plaintiff [name] called the payments
salary, compensation or bonus is not determinative.
Reasonable compensation is the amount that is
paid for similar services, by similar enterprises, under
12.1TAX REFUNDS
303
similar circumstances, to a qualified person, whether
that person is a shareholder of the corporation or not.
In deciding what is reasonable compensation, you
may consider all of the following factors:
1. The size, nature and complexity of Plaintiff
[name]’s business.
2. The quality and quantity of the services actually rendered by the employee, including the
difficulty or simplicity of the work and the
responsibility assumed by the employee.
3. The qualifications, experience and background
of the employee, including any special training
and formal education.
4. Whether or not all of the employee’s time was
devoted to the business, or whether the employee devoted time to other businesses, interests and activities.
5. The salaries paid to others employed by the
Plaintiff [name] and whether and how much
stock they owned in the corporation.
6. What a comparable business pays for comparable services.
7. The relationship between the amounts paid to
the employee and the employee’s shareholdings
in Plaintiff [name].
8. The dividend history of Plaintiff [name].
9. Whether the amount paid was set or adjusted
after the profits for the year were known.
10. The extent of control which the employee or a
member of the employee’s family had over the
Provenance
- Source
- lb5.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-09-03
- Content hash
8159246ede4538b489b7f9768c514c9c9f7514e419b44767aa6717511e69fee0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.