Bindinglaw

US-CA5 · jury_instructions

5th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 11.25

FLSA Damages

activein force · 2026-09-03 – presentas-observed

A. Committee Notes

This charge is for use in FLSA cases involving an

alleged failure to pay overtime or minimum wage.

The FLSA provides for liquidated damages. The

statute states that such damages are to be paid on a

finding of an FLSA § 206 or § 207 violation unless the

“employer shows to the satisfaction of the court that

the act or omission giving rise to such action was in

good faith and that he had reasonable grounds for

believing that his act or omission was not a violation of

the Fair Labor Standards Act.” 29 U.S.C. §§ 216(b),

260. If the employer makes this showing, “the court

may, in its sound discretion, award no liquidated damages or award any amount thereof not to exceed the

amount specified in section 216” of the FLSA. 29 U.S.C.

§ 260. This is a question for the court to determine, not

the jury. The jury answers the willfulness question to

determine the statute of limitations, not to determine

willfulness for the purpose of deciding liquidated damages issues. Black v. SettlePou, P.C. , 732 F.3d 492, 501

(5th Cir. 2013) (citing Singer v. City of Waco , 324 F.3d

813, 822–23 (5th Cir. 2003)); see also Mireles v. Frio

Foods, Inc. , 899 F.2d 1407, 1414–15 (5th Cir. 1990).

When the jury finds that an employer has violated

the FLSA and assesses compensatory damages, the

district court generally must add liquidated damages in

an equal amount. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (“Any employer

who violates the provisions of . . . section 207 of this

title shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of . . . their unpaid overtime

compensation . . . and in an additional equal amount

as liquidated damages.”); Ransom v. M. Patel Enters.,

Inc., 734 F.3d 377, 387 & n.16 (5th Cir. 2013) (citing

Singer, 324 F.3d at 822–23); see also Black , 732 F.3d at

501. The district court has discretion to reduce or deny

liquidated damages if the employer ‘‘ ‘acted in good faith

11.25EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS

289

and had reasonable grounds to believe that its actions

complied with the FLSA.’ ” Black, 732 F.3d at 501 (quoting Singer , 324 F.3d at 822–23); see also 29 U.S.C.

§ 260. A district court must find that an employer acted

reasonably and in good faith in violating the FLSA

before it may award less than the full amount of liquidated damages. See Black , 732 F.3d at 501. If the jury

finds that the employer acted willfully, then the court

cannot find that the employer acted in good faith, and

the court must award liquidated damages. Singer, 324

F.3d at 823.

B. Charge

If you find that Defendant [name] violated the

FLSA, then you must determine the amount of any

damages. You should not conclude from the fact that I

am instructing you on damages that I have any opinion

as to whether Plaintiff [name] has proved liability.

The amount of damages is the difference between

the amount Plaintiff [name] should have been paid and

the amount [he/she] was actually paid. Plaintiff [name]

is entitled to recover lost wages for the two years before

[he/she] filed this lawsuit, unless you find that Defendant [name] either knew or showed reckless disregard

for whether the FLSA prohibited its conduct. If you find

that Defendant [name] knew or showed reckless disregard for whether the FLSA prohibited its conduct, then

Plaintiff [name] is entitled to recover lost wages for

three years before the date [he/she] filed this lawsuit.

Plaintiff [name] filed this lawsuit on —————.

Provenance

Source
lb5.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-03
Edition
2026-09-03
Content hash
539c8be1bc64b77d0ea2e3b6c1abbc2542504f9aaf32b17698f9ff18a1639f5e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.