US-CA5 · jury_instructions
5th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 11.25
FLSA Damages
A. Committee Notes
This charge is for use in FLSA cases involving an
alleged failure to pay overtime or minimum wage.
The FLSA provides for liquidated damages. The
statute states that such damages are to be paid on a
finding of an FLSA § 206 or § 207 violation unless the
“employer shows to the satisfaction of the court that
the act or omission giving rise to such action was in
good faith and that he had reasonable grounds for
believing that his act or omission was not a violation of
the Fair Labor Standards Act.” 29 U.S.C. §§ 216(b),
260. If the employer makes this showing, “the court
may, in its sound discretion, award no liquidated damages or award any amount thereof not to exceed the
amount specified in section 216” of the FLSA. 29 U.S.C.
§ 260. This is a question for the court to determine, not
the jury. The jury answers the willfulness question to
determine the statute of limitations, not to determine
willfulness for the purpose of deciding liquidated damages issues. Black v. SettlePou, P.C. , 732 F.3d 492, 501
(5th Cir. 2013) (citing Singer v. City of Waco , 324 F.3d
813, 822–23 (5th Cir. 2003)); see also Mireles v. Frio
Foods, Inc. , 899 F.2d 1407, 1414–15 (5th Cir. 1990).
When the jury finds that an employer has violated
the FLSA and assesses compensatory damages, the
district court generally must add liquidated damages in
an equal amount. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (“Any employer
who violates the provisions of . . . section 207 of this
title shall be liable to the employee or employees affected in the amount of . . . their unpaid overtime
compensation . . . and in an additional equal amount
as liquidated damages.”); Ransom v. M. Patel Enters.,
Inc., 734 F.3d 377, 387 & n.16 (5th Cir. 2013) (citing
Singer, 324 F.3d at 822–23); see also Black , 732 F.3d at
501. The district court has discretion to reduce or deny
liquidated damages if the employer ‘‘ ‘acted in good faith
11.25EMPLOYMENT CLAIMS
289
and had reasonable grounds to believe that its actions
complied with the FLSA.’ ” Black, 732 F.3d at 501 (quoting Singer , 324 F.3d at 822–23); see also 29 U.S.C.
§ 260. A district court must find that an employer acted
reasonably and in good faith in violating the FLSA
before it may award less than the full amount of liquidated damages. See Black , 732 F.3d at 501. If the jury
finds that the employer acted willfully, then the court
cannot find that the employer acted in good faith, and
the court must award liquidated damages. Singer, 324
F.3d at 823.
B. Charge
If you find that Defendant [name] violated the
FLSA, then you must determine the amount of any
damages. You should not conclude from the fact that I
am instructing you on damages that I have any opinion
as to whether Plaintiff [name] has proved liability.
The amount of damages is the difference between
the amount Plaintiff [name] should have been paid and
the amount [he/she] was actually paid. Plaintiff [name]
is entitled to recover lost wages for the two years before
[he/she] filed this lawsuit, unless you find that Defendant [name] either knew or showed reckless disregard
for whether the FLSA prohibited its conduct. If you find
that Defendant [name] knew or showed reckless disregard for whether the FLSA prohibited its conduct, then
Plaintiff [name] is entitled to recover lost wages for
three years before the date [he/she] filed this lawsuit.
Plaintiff [name] filed this lawsuit on —————.
Provenance
- Source
- lb5.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-09-03
- Content hash
539c8be1bc64b77d0ea2e3b6c1abbc2542504f9aaf32b17698f9ff18a1639f5e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.