Bindinglaw

US-CA3 · jury_instructions

3d Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Criminal) 5.07

Good Faith Defense

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

The offense(s) of (state offenses) charged in the indictment require(s) proof

that (name) acted (describe the required mental state, e.g., “willfully,” “intent to

defraud,” “knowingly defraud,” “intentionally or knowingly making false statements”).

If you find that (name) acted in "good faith," that would be a complete defense to

this charge, because good faith on the part of (name) would be inconsistent with (his)

(her) acting (describe the required mental state).

A person acts in “good faith” when he or she has an honestly held belief,

opinion, or understanding that (describe the belief or opinion that is inconsistent with

the required mental state, e.g., honest belief about the existence of a fact, honest belief in

the truth of statements, honest opinion that acts were not unlawful), even though the

belief, opinion, or understanding turns out to be inaccurate or incorrect. Thus, in

this case if (name) made an honest mistake or had an honest misunderstanding

about (state the belief, opinion or understanding that would be inconsistent with the

required mental state) then (he) (she) did not act (describe the required mental state).

[(Name) did not act in "good faith," however, if, even though (he) (she) honestly

held a certain opinion or belief or understanding, (he) (she) also knowingly made false

statements, representations, or promises to others.]

(Name) does not have the burden of proving “good faith.” Good faith is a

defense because it is inconsistent with the requirement of the offense(s) charged,

that (name) acted (describe the required mental state). As I have told you, it is the

government's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the

24

offense, including the mental state element. In deciding whether the government

proved that (name) acted (describe the required mental state) or, instead, whether

(name) acted in good faith, you should consider all of the evidence presented in the

case that may bear on (name's) state of mind. If you find from the evidence that

(name) acted in good faith, as I have defined it, or if you find for any other reason

that the government has not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that (name) acted

(describe the required mental state), you must find (name) not guilty of the offense of

(state the offense).

Provenance

Source
ca3.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-19
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
7f1fec296e0a1b39100635be81ca0120d2a1ea47d16d847953136be3e7631996
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.