Bindinglaw

US-CA3 · jury_instructions

3d Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Criminal) 2.20

Impeachment of Witness - Violation of Sequestration Order

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

At the beginning of trial, I ordered that no witness (other than (names

of witnesses permitted in courtroom during testimony)) may

(hear)(discuss)(review) the testimony of another witness before (he)(she)

testifies (himself)(herself). The purpose of this order was to prevent the

testimony of one witness from influencing the testimony of another witness.

(Name of witness) violated this order. In evaluating (name of witness)’s

testimony, you may consider the fact that (name of witness) (describe violation,

e.g., remained in the courtroom during the testimony of (name of other witness)).

Provenance

Source
ca3.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-19
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
6de3d436ef1f5fa20af3961c2b33c89eb912a7aa93abc0d984f30a47c1852c08
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.