US-CA3 · jury_instructions
3d Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Criminal) 2.13
Prior Conviction of Defendant Charged with Possession of a Firearm
by a Convicted Felon (18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g))
You have heard evidence (through a stipulation) that the defendant was
convicted before this incident in (name of court; e.g., a court of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a
term exceeding one year.
This prior conviction has been brought to your attention only because
it tends to establish one of the elements of the crime of possession of a firearm
by a convicted felon as set forth in the indictment, specifically, that the
defendant had a prior felony conviction. You are not to speculate as to the
nature of the conviction. You may not consider the prior conviction in
deciding whether (name of defendant) was in knowing possession of the gun
that (he)(she) is charged in this case with possessing, which is a disputed issue
in this case.
The fact that the defendant was found guilty of another crime on
another occasion does not mean that (he)(she) committed this crime on (date
of offense charged in indictment), and you must not use (his)(her) guilt of the
other crime as proof of the crime charged in this case except for the one
element of this crime which I have mentioned. You may find the defendant
guilty of this crime only if the government has proved beyond a reasonable
doubt all of the elements of this crime and that the defendant committed it.
Provenance
- Source
- ca3.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
fbee61ba52ca90fa70c49e83a2fef8451f67a47028fa5c5c85d8df42070ed914
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.