Bindinglaw

US-CA3 · jury_instructions

3d Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Criminal) 2.06

Audio/Video Recordings - Non-consensual (Wiretaps)

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

You are about to hear recordings of conversations with the

defendant(s) which were made without the knowledge of the parties to the

conversations, but with the consent and authorization of the court. These

recordings, sometimes referred to as wiretaps, were lawfully obtained.

The use of this procedure to gather evidence is lawful and the

recordings may be used by either party.

Provenance

Source
ca3.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-19
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
b70ec447050d7758669422d42717eb0b7cd4262fb7d09e3c5cca5e38f95a8388
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.