US-CA3 · jury_instructions
3d Cir. Model Jury Instr. (Civil) 10.2.1
Serious Health Condition
43
Last updated March 2026
id. at 210 (not deciding what would count as a “substantial period” but suggesting that “a minimum 62
of eight hours would seem to be an appropriate period of time ”). 29 C.F.R. § 825.113(b) states: 63
“The term incapacity means inability to work, attend school or perform other regular daily 64
activities due to the serious health condition, treatment therefore, or recovery therefrom.” 65
Incapacity plus treatment 66
29 C.F.R. § 825.115 provides in part: 67
A serious health condition involving continuing treatment by a health care provider 68
includes any one or more of the following: 69
(a) Incapacity and treatment. A period of incapacity of more than three 70
consecutive, full calendar days, and any subsequent treatment or period of 71
incapacity relating to the same condition, that also involves: 72
(1) Treatment two or more times, within 30 days of the first day of 73
incapacity, unless extenuating circumstances exist, by a health care 74
provider, by a nurse under direct supervision of a health care provider, or 75
by a provider of health care services (e.g., physical therapist) under orders 76
of, or on referral by, a health care provider; or 77
(2) Treatment by a health care provider on at least one occasion, 78
which results in a regimen of continuing treatment under the supervision of 79
the health care provider. 80
(3) The requirement in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section for 81
treatment by a health care provider means an in-person visit to a health care 82
provider. The first (or only) in-person treatment visit must take place within 83
seven days of the first day of incapacity. 84
(4) Whether additional treatment visits or a regimen of continuing 85
treatment is necessary within the 30-day period shall be determined by the 86
health care provider. 87
(5) The term extenuating circumstances in paragraph (a)(1) of this 88
section means circumstances beyond the employee ’s control that prevent 89
the follow-up visit from occurring as planned by the health care provider. 90
Whether a given set of circumstances are extenuating depends on the facts. 91
For example, extenuating circumstances exist if a health care provider 92
determines that a second in-person visit is needed within the 30-day period, 93
but the health care provider does not have any available appointments 94
during that time period. 95
Provenance
- Source
- ca3.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-19
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
c459631cc595671660beffeb3cb91d0737eb15b9c17e85ff74150d7dfabd723b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.