Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O69

False Statement Regarding Federal Workers’

activein force · 2024-04-01 – presentact-effective-date

Compensation Benefits

18 U.S.C. § 1920

It’s a Federal crime to knowingly and willfully make a false statement in

connection with an application for, or receipt of, Federal Workers' Compensation

Benefits.

The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following

facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) the Defendant knowingly and willfully made a false statement or

report to the Department of Labor, Office of Workers'

Compensation Programs;

(2) the false statement or report was made in connection with an

application for or receipt of Federal Workers' Compensation

benefits; and

(3) the false statement or report related to a material fact.

A statement or report is “false” if it is untrue when made and the person

making it knows it is untrue.

A “material fact” is an important fact, not some unimportant or trivial detail,

that could influence a decision of the Department of Labor, Office of Workers'

Compensation Programs.

The heart of the crime is attempting to influence the Office of Workers’

Compensation Programs by willfully making a false statement or report concerning

a material fact. The Government does not have to prove that anyone was actually

influenced or misled.

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
criminal-2024-04
Content hash
96b2e1b073d3dccc88bb2895a981539675024e57f795d27e2c779ae2e2dc9ed8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.