US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O62
Involuntary Servitude and Peonage
18 U.S.C. §§ 1581 and 1584
It’s a Federal crime to wilfully hold another person in involuntary servitude.
The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following
facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) the Defendant kept [person’s name] in a condition of involuntary
servitude;
(2) Defendant kept that person for a substantial or significant amount
of time; [and]
(3) the Defendant acted knowingly and willfully[.] [; and]
[(4) the Defendant compelled the involuntary servitude in order to
satisfy a real or imagined debt.]
“Involuntary servitude” means forced or compulsory labor or service for
someone else’s benefit that a person unwillingly performs because of the use or
threat of coercion through law or the legal process, or because of the use or threat
of physical restraint or physical injury.
It makes no difference whether the person initially voluntarily agreed to
perform the work or service. And it doesn’t matter whether a person is paid a
salary or a wage. What matters is whether the person did the work willingly at all
times. If a person begins work willingly and later wants to stop but is forced to
continue because another person uses or threatens to use some kind of coercion or
restraint or cause physical injury, the service becomes involuntary.
So even if the person is paid, the service is involuntary if the person is
forced to work against the person’s will by the use of threats or coercion.
But the Government must prove that the Defendant knowingly and willfully
used or threatened to use coercion and caused the person to reasonably believe that
there was no way to avoid continuing to work.
Legally, servitude becomes involuntary when coercion is sufficient to
completely overcome the will of an ordinary person who has the same general
station in life as the victim and causes the victim to believe that there is no
reasonable means of escape and no choice but to continue working for the
Defendant.
To decide whether a person reasonably believed there was no way to avoid
continued service, you must consider:
• the method or form of coercion threatened or used in relation to
the person’s particular circumstances and conditions;
• the person’s physical and mental condition;
• the person’s age, education, training, experience, and intelligence;
and
• any reasonable means or chances the person may have had to
escape.
The Government must also prove that the person was forced to work for
some significant or substantial amount of time. It doesn’t have to be a specific
length of time, just some length that is more than trivial.
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- criminal-2026-07
- Content hash
ec0b1963ce443b28786b016d4978e53b0f9ede3c667df5d969a5f74c2df2adea
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.