US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O44
Transmission of Wagering Information
18 U.S.C. § 1084
It’s a Federal crime for anyone engaged in betting or wagering as a business
to use a wire -communication facility for an interstate transmission of a bet or
betting information on any sporting event.
The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following
facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) the Defendant was in the business of betting;
(2) as a part of the business, the Defendant knowingly used a wire -
communication facility to send in interstate [or foreign] commerce
bets or information to help with placing bets on a sporting event; and
(3) the defendant did so knowingly and intentionally.
The “business of betting” doesn’t mean that a person’s primary source of
income must come from making bets or wagers, or dealing in wagering
information. It doesn’t matter how many bets a person has made or how much
money the person bet, or whether the person made a profit on betting.
To prove the Defendant was “in the business of betting,” it must be proved
beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant regularly engaged in activities
devoted to betting or wagering with the goal of making a profit. Isolated or
sporadic activities are not a business.
A “wire-communication facility” includes long-distance telephone facilities.
Information conveyed or received by telephone from one state to another
state [or between the United States and a foreign country], is a transmission in
“interstate” [or “foreign”] commerce.
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- criminal-2026-07
- Content hash
4d1f09dff3679b5fa2bba7912085f9d229353743bde6206b7770c6441e716fbf
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.