Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O44

Transmission of Wagering Information

activein force · 2026-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

18 U.S.C. § 1084

It’s a Federal crime for anyone engaged in betting or wagering as a business

to use a wire -communication facility for an interstate transmission of a bet or

betting information on any sporting event.

The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following

facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) the Defendant was in the business of betting;

(2) as a part of the business, the Defendant knowingly used a wire -

communication facility to send in interstate [or foreign] commerce

bets or information to help with placing bets on a sporting event; and

(3) the defendant did so knowingly and intentionally.

The “business of betting” doesn’t mean that a person’s primary source of

income must come from making bets or wagers, or dealing in wagering

information. It doesn’t matter how many bets a person has made or how much

money the person bet, or whether the person made a profit on betting.

To prove the Defendant was “in the business of betting,” it must be proved

beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant regularly engaged in activities

devoted to betting or wagering with the goal of making a profit. Isolated or

sporadic activities are not a business.

A “wire-communication facility” includes long-distance telephone facilities.

Information conveyed or received by telephone from one state to another

state [or between the United States and a foreign country], is a transmission in

“interstate” [or “foreign”] commerce.

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
criminal-2026-07
Content hash
4d1f09dff3679b5fa2bba7912085f9d229353743bde6206b7770c6441e716fbf
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.