Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O42.4

Computer Fraud:

activein force · 2025-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

Trafficking in Passwords

18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(6)(A) or (B)

It’s a Federal crime for anyone – knowingly and with intent to defraud – to

traffic in any password that will enable a person to access a computer without

permission.

The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following

facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:

(1) the Defendant trafficked in a computer password without

permission;

(2) the Defendant intended to defraud someone; and

(3) the Defendant's acts [affected interstate commerce] [involved

access to a computer used by or for the United States

Government].

A “computer” is any high -speed data -processing device that can perform

logical, arithmetic, or storage functions, including any data -storage facility or

communications facility that is directly related to or operates in conjunction with

the device.

To “traffic” in a computer password is to transfer the password to someone

else or to get it with the intent to transfer it to someone else, either with or without

any financial interest in the transfer.

The “intent to defraud” is the specific intent to deceive or cheat someone,

usually for personal financial gain or to cause financial loss to someone else.

The term “interstate commerce” refers to any transaction or event that

involves travel, trade, transportation or communication between a place in one

state and a place in another state.

The term “foreign commerce” refers to any transaction or event that involves

travel, trade, transportation or communication between a place in the United States

and a place outside the United States.

[The Government claims that the Defendant’s acts affected interstate

commerce because the Defendant [used interstate telephone or Internet facilities in

committing the alleged offense]. If you find that the Government has proved

beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant did the acts claimed, then you may

find that interstate commerce was affected.]

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
criminal-2025-09
Content hash
a8ebb4ab998f1634c2600d925e303309c5e6ea27c959183a71ca9efb2a53331f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.