US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O34.3
False Statement to a Firearms Dealer
18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6)
It’s a Federal crime to make a false statement to a licensed firearms dealer
while buying a firearm.
The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following
facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) the Defendant bought or tried to buy a firearm from a federally
licensed firearms dealer;
(2) the Defendant [knowingly made a false or fictitious statement,
orally or in writing] [knowingly furnished false identification] that
was [intended to deceive] [likely to deceive] the dealer; and
(3) the subject matter of the false [statement] [identification] was
material to the lawfulness of the sale.
A “firearm” is any weapon designed to or readily convertible to expel a
projectile by the action of an explosive. The term includes the frame or receiver of
any such weapon or any firearm muffler or silencer.
A [statement] [identification] is “false” if it is untrue when [made] [used]
and the person [making] [using] it knows it is untrue.
A false [statement] [identification] is “likely to deceive” if under the
circumstances a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would probably be deceived.
Whether the allegedly false [statement] [identification] is “material” is a
question of law for the court to decide. If you find the [statement] [identification]
in this case is false, then it was material to the sale.
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- criminal-2024-04
- Content hash
5e7c7b26dac288f07230a2004e3ec2b2f075b8a74136a427b52c422637ad3262
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.