US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O30.4
Interstate Transmission of an Extortionate Communication
18 U.S.C. § 875(d)
It’s a Federal crime to knowingly send in [interstate] [foreign] commerce an
extortionate communication.
The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following
facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) the Defendant knowingly sent a message in
[interstate] [foreign] commerce containing a true
threat to [damage the [reputation] [property] of
another] [accuse another of a crime]; and
(2) the Defendant did so with the intent to extort
money or something else of value to the
Defendant.
The Government doesn’t have to prove that the Defendant intended to carry
out the threat or succeeded in obtaining the money or any other thing of value.
[To transmit something in “interstate commerce” means to send it from a
place in one state to a place in another state.]
[To transmit something in “foreign commerce” means to send it from a place
in the United States to anyplace outside the United States.]
A “true threat” is a serious threat – not idle talk, a careless remark, or
something said jokingly – that is made under circumstances that would place a
reasonable person in fear of [damage to their [property] [reputation]] [damage to
another person’s [property] [reputation]] [being accused of a crime] [another
person being accused of a crime].
To act with “intent to extort” means to act with the purpose of obtaining
money or something of value from someone who consents because of the true
threat.
A “thing of value” is anything that has value to the Defendant, whether it’s
tangible or not.
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- criminal-2025-09
- Content hash
68f103c80faca1526257336377f2a354b037f472233ffa38e965200a0b1fbfdc
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.