US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) O105
Possession or Transfer Of Non-Tax-Paid
Distilled Spirits
26 U.S.C. §§ 5604(a)(1) and 5301(d)
It’s a Federal crime to knowingly [transport] [possess] [buy] [sell] [transfer]
any distilled spirits unless the spirits’ immediate container has a closure showing
that it complies with the Internal Revenue laws.
The Defendant can be found guilty of this crime only if all the following
facts are proved beyond a reasonable doubt:
(1) the Defendant knowingly [transported] [possessed] [bought] [sold]
[transferred] distilled spirits; and
(2) the immediate containers of the distilled spirits didn’t bear a
closure or other device required by law.
A “closure or other device as required by law” means a closure such as a
seal that’s designed to require breaking in order to open the container and was
attached to the container when it was taken from bonded premises or from customs
custody.
[The indictment charges that the Defendant [transported] [and] [possessed]
[and] [bought] [and] [sold] [and] [transferred] distilled spirits in an unlawful
manner. The law specifies various ways in which the crime may occur. The
Government doesn’t have to prove that the Defendant broke the law in all of those
ways. It only has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant
[transported] [or] [possessed] [or] [bought] [or] [sold] [or] [transferred] distilled
spirits in an unlawful manner. But you must all agree on the way the Defendant
broke the law.]
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- criminal-2025-09
- Content hash
bc32ddd1c29636521a3e8a1926d21e11b09ffe7df958ffe1f0e2d742da54e3e5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.