US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) B6.6
Impeachment of Witnesses because of Inconsistent Statement
or Felony Conviction
(Defendant with Felony Conviction Testifies)
You should also ask yourself whether there was evidence that a witness
testified falsely about an important fact. And ask whether there was evidence that
at some other time a witness said or did something, or didn’t say or do something,
that was different from the testimony the witness gave during this trial.
To decide whether you believe a witness, you may consider the fact that the
witness has been convicted of a felony or a crime involving dishonesty or a false
statement. But keep in mind that a simple mistake doesn’t mean a witness wasn’t
telling the truth as he or she remembers it. People naturally tend to forget some
things or remember them inaccurately. So, if a witness misstated something, you
must decide whether it was because of an innocent lapse in memory or an
intentional deception. The significance of the misstatement may depend on
whether the misstatement was about an important fact or about an unimportant
detail.
A defendant has a right not to testify. But since the Defendant did testify,
you should decide whether you believe the Defendant’s testimony in the same way
as that of any other witness.
[Evidence that a Defendant was previously convicted of a crime is not
evidence of guilt of the crime(s) in this trial. But you may use the evidence to
decide whether you believe the Defendant’s testimony.]
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- criminal-2025-09
- Content hash
ca945dd9a821a4e90a8e308a7d6b0291b5fd6a69dc0e351436d0e47c7fcdfba0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.