US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.32
Copyright – Damages – Statutory Damages
[Name of plaintiff] seeks a statutory damage award. “Statutory damages” are
damages that are established by Congress in the Copyright Act. The purposes are
to compensate the copyright owner, penalize the infringer, and deter future
copyright law violations. The amount awarded must be between $750 and $30,000
for each copyrighted work that you found to be infringed, unless one of the
exceptions applies, as I’ll explain later.
To determine the appropriate amount to award, you can consider the
following factors:
• the profits [name of defendant] earned because of the infringement;
• the revenues that [name of plaintiff] lost because of the infringement;
• the difficulty of proving [name of plaintiff]’s actual damages;
• the circumstances of the infringement;
• whether [name of defendant] intentionally infringed [name of
plaintiff]’s copyright; and
• deterrence of future infringement.
If [name of plaintiff] proves that [name of defendant] willfully infringed
[his/her/its] copyright, you may – but are not required to – increase the statutory
damage award to a sum as high as $150,000 per copyrighted work.
Infringement is “willful” if [name of plaintiff] proves that [name of
defendant] knew that [his/her/its] actions constituted infringement of [name of
2
5.13
plaintiff]’s copyright or that [name of defendant] recklessly disregarded the
possibility that [his/her/its] actions infringed a copyright.
If you the Jury find infringement, you must award [name of plaintiff] not
less than $750 for each copyrighted work that [name of defendant] has infringed.
There is an exception to the $750 minimum statutory damages you must
award if you find infringement by [name of defendant] was an “innocent
infringement.” If [name of defendant] proves that he innocently infringed [name
of plaintiff]’s copyright, you may – but are not required to – reduce the statutory
damage award to a sum as low as $200 per copyrighted work. Infringement is
“innocent” if [name of defendant] proves that [he/she/it] didn’t know, and had no
reason to know, that [his/her/its] acts constituted infringement.
You can’t find that [name of defendant] was an “ innocent infringer” if a
notice of copyright appeared in the correct form and position on the published
[copy/copies] of [name of plaintiff]’s [name of infringed work] to which [name of
defendant] had access.
A notice is in correct form if it includes [the symbol © (the letter C in a
circle)/the word “Copyright”/ or, in the case of phonorecords, abbreviation “ ”
(the letter p in a circle)], [the name of the copyright owner/an abbreviation by
which the copyright owner’s name can be recognized/a generally known
designation of the copyright’s owner] [and, in the case of a phonorecord, in
3
5.13
addition to the foregoing, if the producer of the sound recording is named on the
phonorecord labels or containers, and if no other name appears in conjunction with
the notice, the producer’s name must be considered part of the notice], and the year
of first publication of the work. A notice is in the correct position if it appears in a
manner and location that gives reasonable notice of the claim of copyright.]
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY
You should answer the following questions for each work infringed:
1. Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that [name of
defendant] infringed on [name of infringed work]?
Answer Yes or No ________________
If yes, proceed to question 2. If no, skip Questions No. 2 and No. 3, and
proceed to the next alleged infringing work. [If no other alleged infringing
works: If no, sign the verdict form.]
2. Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that [name of
defendant]’s infringement was “innocent?”
Answer Yes or No ________________
If your answer to this question is “No,” then proceed to Question No. 3.
If your answer to this question is “Yes,” then proceed to Question No.
2B.
4
5.13
2B. Given that you the jury have found [name of defendant] is an innocent
infringer as to [name of infringed work], what amount of statutory damages
do you award between $200 and $30,000?
$
After calculating statutory damages, skip Question No. 3 and proceed
to the next alleged infringing work. [If no other alleged infringing
works: After calculating statutory damages, sign the verdict form.]
3. Do you find by a preponderance of the evidence that [name of
defendant]’s infringement was willful?
Answer Yes or No ________________
If your answer to this question is “No,” then you must award statutory
damages between $750 and $30,000 per work. If your answer to this
question is “Yes,” then you must award statutory damages between
$750 and $150,000 per work.
3B. What is the amount of statutory damages you award for this work?
$
After calculating statutory damages, proceed to the next alleged
infringing work. [If no other alleged infringing works: After
calculating statutory damages, sign the verdict form.]
5
5.13
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
bc37b4ed24ccc5c0ac5a26f5252acd471babd247411b177fe49ef71bb2d5bf03
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.