US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.30
Copyright – Damages – General Charge
If you find that [name of plaintiff] has failed to prove [his/her/its] copyright -
infringement claim or that [name of defendant] has proved its affirmative
defense[s] by a preponderance of the evidence, you won’t consider the question of
damages. If you find that [name of plaintiff] has proved by a preponderance of
evidence that [name of defendant] has infringed [name of plaintiff]’s copyright,
and [name of defendant] has not proved a defense, then you must determine
whether [name of plaintiff] has proved damages. [Name of plaintiff] may recover
either its actual damages plus [name of defendant]’s profits attributable to
infringement or, at [name of plaintiff’s] option, statutory damages. A plaintiff may
choose between the two forms of damages after you the jury have made findings as
to each or a plaintiff may elect between the two forms of damages before the jury
makes any findings.
[Read one of the alternatives below, depending on [name of plaintiff]’s
election of remedies. See Annotation.]
[Alternative 1. [N ame of plaintiff] has elected to [seek its actual damages
plus [name of defendant]’s profits attributable to infringement] [seek statutory
damages]: In the next instruction, I’ll define how you must determine the amount
of damages, if any, to award to [name of plaintiff].]
2
5.13
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
7d53b3e95a3e7264a91eb3f0ad88c9f0558d1af9c66d3d06ce2ac1e22c4fcc8f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.