Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.30

Copyright – Damages – General Charge

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

If you find that [name of plaintiff] has failed to prove [his/her/its] copyright -

infringement claim or that [name of defendant] has proved its affirmative

defense[s] by a preponderance of the evidence, you won’t consider the question of

damages. If you find that [name of plaintiff] has proved by a preponderance of

evidence that [name of defendant] has infringed [name of plaintiff]’s copyright,

and [name of defendant] has not proved a defense, then you must determine

whether [name of plaintiff] has proved damages. [Name of plaintiff] may recover

either its actual damages plus [name of defendant]’s profits attributable to

infringement or, at [name of plaintiff’s] option, statutory damages. A plaintiff may

choose between the two forms of damages after you the jury have made findings as

to each or a plaintiff may elect between the two forms of damages before the jury

makes any findings.

[Read one of the alternatives below, depending on [name of plaintiff]’s

election of remedies. See Annotation.]

[Alternative 1. [N ame of plaintiff] has elected to [seek its actual damages

plus [name of defendant]’s profits attributable to infringement] [seek statutory

damages]: In the next instruction, I’ll define how you must determine the amount

of damages, if any, to award to [name of plaintiff].]

2

5.13

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-12
Content hash
7d53b3e95a3e7264a91eb3f0ad88c9f0558d1af9c66d3d06ce2ac1e22c4fcc8f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.