Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.29

Copyright – Defenses – Affirmative Defense – Statute of Limitations

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

[Name of defendant] claims that [name of plaintiff]’s copyright claim is

barred by the statute of limitations, which is a time limit for bringing a claim.

To establish that the statute of limitations bars [name of plaintiff]’s

copyright claim, [name of defendant] must prove by a preponderance of the

evidence that [name of plaintiff] failed to file [his/her/its] lawsuit within three

years after [he/she/it] knew or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have

known about the infringement.

Each act of infringement is a separate harm that creates an independent

claim for relief. The statute of limitations only prevents [name of plaintiff] from

recovering remedies for infringing acts that occurred more than three years before

[name of plaintiff] filed [his/her/its] lawsuit.

SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY

1. Did [name of plaintiff] fail to file [his/her/its] lawsuit within three

years after [he/she/it] knew or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence,

should have known about the infringement?

Answer Yes or No _____________

2. If the answer to the above question is “Yes,” do you find that the

statute of limitations bars [name of plaintiff]’s copyright -infringement

claim?

Answer Yes or No _____________

2

5.13

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-12
Content hash
82e4fd8568f7c3024aaafee05bac4a727ac6b71c71c10fd497a59f40cacdaceb
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.