Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.28

Copyright – Defenses – Affirmative Defense – Copyright Estoppel

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(Advisory Jury)

Name of defendant] claims that [name of plaintiff] is barred from asserting

his copyright -infringement claim against [name of defendant] by the doctrine of

estoppel. To establish estoppel, [name of defendant] must prove each of the

following elements by a preponderance of the evidence:

First, you must find that [name of plaintiff] knew the facts of [name of

defendant]’s infringing conduct.

Second, you must find that [name of plaintiff]’s statement or conduct (either

action or inaction) caused [name of defendant] to believe that [name of plaintiff]

wouldn’t pursue a claim for copyright infringement against [him/her/it].

Third, you must find that [name of plaintiff] intended for [name of

defendant] to act on [his/her/its] statement or conduct, or [name of defendant] had

a right to believe [name of plaintiff] so intended.

Fourth, you must find that [name of defendant] didn’t reasonably believe

that [name of plaintiff] would pursue a claim for copyright infringement against

[him/her/it].

And fifth, you must find that [name of defendant] was injured as a result of

his reliance on [name of plaintiff]’s statement or conduct.

2

5.13

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-12
Content hash
27c55d6e4f3e0130b848763019e61ebce69cc02f18729c33d6cb197ee17929fe
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.