US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.27
Copyright – Defenses – Affirmative Defense – Implied License
[Name of defendant] claims that [name of plaintiff] granted him a license to
use [name of plaintiff]’s copyrighted work. A license is a contract giving someone
permission to use the work. A license doesn’t have to be in writing. Rather, as
alleged here, a license can be implied from conduct. To establish this defense,
[name of defendant] must prove each of the following by a preponderance of the
evidence:
First you must find that [name of plaintiff] created the work, or caused it to
be created, at [name of defendant]’s request or the request of someone acting on
[name of defendant]’s behalf.
Second, you must find that [name of plaintiff] delivered the work, or caused
it to be delivered, to [name of defendant] or someone acting on [name of
defendant]’s behalf.
And third, you must find that [name of plaintiff] intended that [name of
defendant] [insert exclusive rights allegedly violated (i.e., copy, distribute, publicly
display, publicly perform, or create derivative works based upon)] [his/her/its]
copyrighted work. [Name of plaintiff]’s intent may be inferred from the work’s
nature or the circumstances surrounding the work’s creation.
If you find that [name of defendant] has proved these elements by a
preponderance of the evidence, your verdict must be for [name of defendant] on
2
5.13
the claim of copyright infringement if [name of defendant]’s use doesn’t exceed
the scope of the [his/her/its] license. [Name of defendant] can still commit
copyright infringement if [he/she/it] exceeded the scope of the license.
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY
1. Did [name of plaintiff] create the copyrighted work at issue, or
cause it to be created, at [name of defendant]’s request or the request of
someone acting on [name of defendant]’s behalf?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If the answer to the above question is “Yes,” answer the next
question; if not, you should stop here.
2. Did [name of plaintiff] deliver the copyrighted work at issue, or
cause it to be delivered, to [name of defendant] or someone acting on [name
of defendant]’s behalf?
Answer Yes or No _____________
If the answer to the above question is “Yes,” answer the next
question; if not, you should stop here.
3. Did [name of plaintiff] intend that [name of defendant] [insert
exclusive rights allegedly violated (i.e., copy, distribute, publicly display,
publicly perform, or create derivative works based upon)] his copyrighted
work?
3
5.13
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
a05b522b7bfdaf4f2eb3d9b6c14fa4674f19b641cfcc25c5b1036c11e2be4f30
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.