Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.27

Copyright – Defenses – Affirmative Defense – Implied License

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

[Name of defendant] claims that [name of plaintiff] granted him a license to

use [name of plaintiff]’s copyrighted work. A license is a contract giving someone

permission to use the work. A license doesn’t have to be in writing. Rather, as

alleged here, a license can be implied from conduct. To establish this defense,

[name of defendant] must prove each of the following by a preponderance of the

evidence:

First you must find that [name of plaintiff] created the work, or caused it to

be created, at [name of defendant]’s request or the request of someone acting on

[name of defendant]’s behalf.

Second, you must find that [name of plaintiff] delivered the work, or caused

it to be delivered, to [name of defendant] or someone acting on [name of

defendant]’s behalf.

And third, you must find that [name of plaintiff] intended that [name of

defendant] [insert exclusive rights allegedly violated (i.e., copy, distribute, publicly

display, publicly perform, or create derivative works based upon)] [his/her/its]

copyrighted work. [Name of plaintiff]’s intent may be inferred from the work’s

nature or the circumstances surrounding the work’s creation.

If you find that [name of defendant] has proved these elements by a

preponderance of the evidence, your verdict must be for [name of defendant] on

2

5.13

the claim of copyright infringement if [name of defendant]’s use doesn’t exceed

the scope of the [his/her/its] license. [Name of defendant] can still commit

copyright infringement if [he/she/it] exceeded the scope of the license.

SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY

1. Did [name of plaintiff] create the copyrighted work at issue, or

cause it to be created, at [name of defendant]’s request or the request of

someone acting on [name of defendant]’s behalf?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If the answer to the above question is “Yes,” answer the next

question; if not, you should stop here.

2. Did [name of plaintiff] deliver the copyrighted work at issue, or

cause it to be delivered, to [name of defendant] or someone acting on [name

of defendant]’s behalf?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If the answer to the above question is “Yes,” answer the next

question; if not, you should stop here.

3. Did [name of plaintiff] intend that [name of defendant] [insert

exclusive rights allegedly violated (i.e., copy, distribute, publicly display,

publicly perform, or create derivative works based upon)] his copyrighted

work?

3

5.13

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-12
Content hash
a05b522b7bfdaf4f2eb3d9b6c14fa4674f19b641cfcc25c5b1036c11e2be4f30
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.27 · binding.law