Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.23

Copyright – Infringement – Software Compatibility

activein force · 2024-04-01 – presentact-effective-date

In alleged copyright infringement for software, some parts of the software

are required because of external factors. These external factors include:

1. the need for the computer program to perform certain functions in a

specific computing environment;

2. the mechanical specifications of the computer on which a program

is intended to run; and

3. compatibility requirements of other programs that the program is

designed to perform in conjunction with.

So if you find that [name of defendant] has copied a portion of [name of

plaintiff]’s software, but that [name of defendant] used those elements because of

external factors such as compatibility, the external considerations may mean

there’s no infringement.

SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES TO THE JURY

Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence:

1. That [name of defendant] copied any portion of [name of

plaintiff]’s copyrighted software?

Answer Yes or No _____________

[If you answer “No,” you don’t need to answer the following

question.]

2. That [name of defendant]’s use of elements of [name of plaintiff]’s

copyrighted software is a result of external factors such as the requirements

2

5.13

of the specific computing environment, technical specifications, or

compatibility?

Answer Yes or No _____________

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2024-04
Content hash
d85fe53e249e0b2ffec2d55dc6102d1f00b21428c7780a2b85aad2efa09564f6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.23 · binding.law