Bindinglaw

US-CA11 · jury_instructions

11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.17

Copyright – Infringement – Introduction to Elements

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

If you’re persuaded that [name of plaintiff] owns a valid copyright, you can

consider whether [name of defendant] improperly copied [name of plaintiff]’s

copyrighted material. It is the burden of [name of plaintiff] to show that [name of

defendant] infringed on [his/her/its] valid copyright. This is called “infringement”

of a copyright. [Name of plaintiff] must show that [name of defendant] infringed

on [his/her/its] valid copyright.

In this case, [name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] infringed

[his/her/its] copyright in [name of plaintiff’s copyrighted work] by copying part[s]

of it and including the copied material in [name of defendant]’s work, [name of

defendant’s copyrighted work]. To succeed on this claim, [name of plaintiff] must

prove that [name of defendant] copied the part[s] of [name of plaintiff]’s

copyrighted work that the law protects.

There are two ways in which [name of plaintiff] can prove a claim of

copyright infringement.

First, [name of plaintiff] can show direct evidence that [name of defendant]

actually copied the copyrighted material. For example, [name of plaintiff] could

introduce believable eyewitness testimony or an admission by [name of defendant].

Such direct evidence is rare.

2

5.13

Provenance

Source
ca11.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
civil-2025-12
Content hash
5a7ff54ffd40346f9e2049d74d04660bbeaa148ab6f7e97c5d5b254b700c1bc3
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.