US-CA11 · jury_instructions
11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 9.17
Copyright – Infringement – Introduction to Elements
If you’re persuaded that [name of plaintiff] owns a valid copyright, you can
consider whether [name of defendant] improperly copied [name of plaintiff]’s
copyrighted material. It is the burden of [name of plaintiff] to show that [name of
defendant] infringed on [his/her/its] valid copyright. This is called “infringement”
of a copyright. [Name of plaintiff] must show that [name of defendant] infringed
on [his/her/its] valid copyright.
In this case, [name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] infringed
[his/her/its] copyright in [name of plaintiff’s copyrighted work] by copying part[s]
of it and including the copied material in [name of defendant]’s work, [name of
defendant’s copyrighted work]. To succeed on this claim, [name of plaintiff] must
prove that [name of defendant] copied the part[s] of [name of plaintiff]’s
copyrighted work that the law protects.
There are two ways in which [name of plaintiff] can prove a claim of
copyright infringement.
First, [name of plaintiff] can show direct evidence that [name of defendant]
actually copied the copyrighted material. For example, [name of plaintiff] could
introduce believable eyewitness testimony or an admission by [name of defendant].
Such direct evidence is rare.
2
5.13
Provenance
- Source
- ca11.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- civil-2025-12
- Content hash
5a7ff54ffd40346f9e2049d74d04660bbeaa148ab6f7e97c5d5b254b700c1bc3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.